You didn't fall into a trap. You tried to look more than you are by posting private information on the www and you got caught. If you'd accepted your breach of trust for what it was, you could have moved on, but you keep trying to claim inside knowledge that you clearly don't have. You're making an absolute fool of yourself.
Several weeks ago you were emailed and given the opportunity to make your points directly to the CTWD group. You didn't reply. It's not unreasonable to conclude that you are more interested in making noise, than getting answers.
When was I emailed? Who by? Did I reply, because if I didn't perhaps it is because I didn't get the email! How many times do I have to say it...I do not have issues with CTWD......it's about what is posted on here!
I think the details of that meeting have been disclosed and discussed far more on here than they have by the OSC to its members. I don't know what you mean when you say the OSC reported back. I've heard/seen nothing official as an OSC member and I only heard a little bit about it from the OSC representative because I asked him in person. OLM on the other hand has written pages and pages about it on here.
Details of the meeting have been posted on here, only the actual notes(they're not really minutes) haven't been released, for reasons posted a million times. The OSC, CTWD, HCSS, not606, CI, AN, Tigers Co-op, Tigerlink and the Ulltras haven't released those notes to anyone, but it seems only conspiracy theorists on here have an issue with that. I didn't take the notes, they're not mine to release and once the decision was taken not to release them, then they were obviously not going to be disclosed to one random person on a message board. You like making a lot of noise on here, mostly aimed at me as the CTWD rep, which is ironic considering that you're not even a member of CTWD, but you are a member of two of the other groups who attended the meeting with AA, can I ask why you're not directing your questions at them?
If Mr. Allam discussed financial arrangements with family members in a meeting where there was a rep from a forum of which I'm a member, I would like that rep to tell me about the financial arrangements. Or more specifically, just the bank account details and sort code numbers will do, you can leave the gobbledygook out.
You just don't get it do you OLM, this is only about what gets posted on here. You went to the meeting as the rep from this board didn't you? Wasn't the invite for someone from this board to attend the meeting? You got flak at the time and I supported you as OUR representative to the meeting. Are you saying that you went there as our rep to CTWD because if that was the case why did you need to go. Its you who put yourself up for this, no one else. I defended the point about minutes generally to be agreed by all parties. It is you who keeps going back to CTWD and I have no beef with them. Its your posts that I am challenging, just as you challenged Tiger Filey.
Can I just ask, if all the details from the meeting were made public and they subsequently caused legal or personal problems for the Allam family, would you be happy?
I did go to the meeting as the rep for this board, but I'm not sure what you expect from me. Do you expect me to publish someone else's notes, without their permission, against the wishes of the CTWD committee and potentially damage the club? Apart from the Allam's financial dealings and the precise wording of AA's rant at the council, I've already reported what happened in the meeting, what else do you want?
I can't remember which clubs fan sites put up articles about it(I think Brentford was one), if you check the @NoToHullTigers Twitter feed from a couple of days ago you'll see loads of comments from fans of different clubs.
Well here's one. Nice piece on tomorrow's game too. http://rokerreport.sbnation.com/201...-some-no-to-hull-tigers-talk-with-john-uzzell
better late than never.. I'm now a member of CTWD - owe it to myself & my late dad, grandad, great uncle & great-great uncle (he who supported City back in 1908 according to a post-card we have..) and to stand up to dictators.
