I honestly hope we smash Hull, I never really had a problem with Bruce he came in and give it his best shot. Unfortunately for everybody it wasn't good enough and we starting going backwards so we needed to change. But since he left he hasn't stopped moaning and Hull fans come on here telling me he is tricked or lead into talking about Sunderland by the press.....bullshit all he has to do is so no comment or move on but he can't because he like a man who still loves he's ex when she left him and can't help himself talking about her or having a dig. I'd love to say well done and what a great he has done with Hull but he bares Sunderland so much ill will it's untrue that I'd rather the bitter man slips back into the championship after all its his fault he ****ed up managing the biggest team he will ever manage and it's eating away at him. We even loan him a player and he complains when we decide to make a new agreement to re loan the player because he wants to end it. Does he not think our transfer team were more bothered about bringing the 5 new players we needed in..........no because in Bruces's fat head everybody at Sunderland were plotting his downfall in our hollowed our Volcano liar twiddling our evil mustaches lol. Let's smash these bast Ards on Saturday and forget all about them forever.......
I'll like him a bit more if he continues the slide against us. After Hull we have three of the top four away!
Sid, I'm not as worried as I once was. We've won at Everton and did well at Man Utd. Even though it was Fulham the 4-1 was impressive and we annihilated Newcastle. Our away style is coming on with every game and I'm looking forward to testing it at City and Arsenal. Arsenal made a right meal of it against Palace. The pressures all on them isn't it?
It's what I'm banking on mate! A win against one of those three would be monumental, but the first thing is to get 3 points off Hull.
He forgets the fact that we lent them Elmo last season who played a big part in them getting promoted. They couldve still been playing in the Championship this season without him.
It must really grate on you that I've shown that he does, quite often ....... having said that I'd expect you to argue. It's quite natural to defend your club
There's been times we could've done with him on the bench tbh. He's not good enough to start regularly, in the Premier League, but he's honest and will always confuse the opposition.
We played it exactly how I said we should. Love it. And the Cattermole Stoke thing was executed brilliantly too.
Smugs. would not worry about OLM being confused.He s confused about many issues and confuses his point of view as fact.He is a leading light in the anti name change group and I suspect will pull his own knob off if he can appear on Look North. A group with a tiny membership (including people who do not actively support the club) are the majority of the fans and his group represents the fans who were there in the bad old days.I was one of many fans who were there and could not give a toss about the name change. Please feel free to take the piss about the name change as most of us do not care and can survive a bit of banter unlike the egg shell personalties who will be having a breakdown if they get teased.
Yes mate, you did .......... as you're clever can you tell me how we lose a director of football and suddenly start to do things right without one?
Who mentioned the name change ........... no one on here could care less. This is about Bruce opening his fat mouth about Sunderland, again and again and again. We wanted him in despite him being a Geordie and wanted him out because he's clueless. We were wrong to want him in and right to want him out, he's not good enough for us. Many of our supporters are proud Geordies so his stupid comments show exactly how he blames everyone else for his shortcomings.
To be honest, the only thing that gets my interest regarding Hull is the name change shenanigans. I find it truly shocking that a wannabe dictator can come into a club and think it is OK to throw away a clubs history to satisfy his own ego..
Your link doesn't work, but no doubt it was Bruce answering a question from a journalist like normal. Bruce does not have fond memories of his time at Sunderland and does not voluntarily talk about Sunderland all the time, the quotes posted are generally responses to journalists asking him questions, he recently said he was getting sick of it. He's moved on now, you should do the same.
Sorry to have to say this, but i expect most on here are really not interested in your Hull disputes between Hull supporters. Isn't this something you should be doing on the Hull board?
Whatever the case, you were wrong ........... he talks about Sunderland even when the situation has absolutely nothing to do with him. As I said, he even had to go on about Sunderland when Hull were promoted ............. why? It's always the same excuse, 'Someone must have asked him a question' that he doesn't have to answer. This is typical, "Paolo Di Canio’s methods were outdated", says Steve Bruce after Sunderland sack boss http://metro.co.uk/2013/09/23/paolo...eve-bruce-after-sunderland-sack-boss-4088552/
Whenever we get clowns from the Hull board another one of them will say 'Yes but he's not really one of us he's just one of a handful of idiots'. They must have hands like ****ing catchers mitts
