According to the telegaph Arsenal have said it isn't a serious injury and will keep him out for Crystal Palace only...
The rumour now is that Arsenal were aware that Kallstrom had a minor back problem and that he did not pick up the injury during training
Why don't we just sign all players with injury problems, Sanago, now Kallstorm, let's get some more, because even having the original crooked Diaby isn't enough, we need as many as possible.
If that is true that would mean he had a setback in training, as this wouldn't have made the news if his training session wasn't cut short.
Lol, wow, sent off on his first showing, what a ****ing idiot. Concentrates more on his stupid 'Dench' nonsense, I don't know why any football team would even want this idiot.
Always was, and still is a talentless clown. Everyone but the most deluded in this board (who would defend a piece of turd with our crest in it) always said it.
They're saying he hasn't trained at all. He arrived with the issue and was never meant to train today according to the new stories. And the reason it is in the news is because a Swedish paper broke the story with some sensationalist headline about how he "could" be out for 2-3 months after injuring himself in his first session after his transfer. After tons of retweets news outlets start to run the story based off the original story and by the time all the smaller news outlets are reporting it the bigger ones pick up on it so as not to look like they have missed a story. Sofar there is nothing concrete to say whether he is injured, whether he arrived injured or how bad the injury might be. It's hilariosu watching the news machine that is the internet explode with tit bitsof information which no source for any of it
Lol I remember at the start of the 2012 season, when he started early in the season, some muppets on this board were talking about Frimpong replacing Song.
That was probably me (telling it like it is ) and Piskie on the other side hyping up Frimpong, because he showed so much hart getting a red or something.
You also claimed Chensey was hopeless and was never good enough to be our number one and that Ramsey was not also good enough for us and should have been sold, but those prediction worked out well.
That's cute that you came so quickly in defense of the deluded board guardian, but I didn't say such a thing about Ramsey.
I am not a black-white person who sees no shades of gray. Everything I've said about Walcott has been spot on throughout the years. All I've said was that he is as much as useless against dense defenses that leave no space, and he shouldn't be a starter against them. That to the fanboys means that i hate him.
Where was I wrong about that? Wouldn't it have been better if he was loaned? He was the weakest link in our midfield that season, and we improved everytime we played without him. I've never failed to mention that he was the most promising younsters we had, but our season was hurt by Wenger's insistence in forcing him back.
