No, 5 minutes. Which is still a long way off your original comment implying they played for an extended period with 10 men. Seriously, have you not got some neg repping to be getting on with?
Yeah, Chelsea were really lucky that West Ham didn't do a smash & grab. By losing a man for the last 6 minutes, they really reduced their chances of scoring!! Based on the fact that they had 11 men for 91 minutes and managed 1 shot (an average of 0.000999 shots per man per minute), they missed out on having another 0.005994 shots. Phew!!
5 minutes 36 seconds I never implied any length of time in the original post 22% of your shots on target were against 10 men (2/9)
Someone has changed his tune. I thought your point was that West ham would have created goalscoring opportunities if they had 11 men, not how it affected Chelsea's goalscoring chances. Why have you got such a massive chip on your shoulder about Chelsea anyway?
London - he's also ignored the fact that by only having 10 men, they reduced their shot count potential by a massive 0.005994 shots.
Both Mourinho is one of the most cheating, anti-football managers in the world (and certainly the one with the most expensive squads) so his #hyprocrisy is hilarious and deserving of comment
At least you are honest that you hate Chelsea and Mourinho. Well we are going to be around for a while, so I suggest you stop the hating, otherwise football will be a miserably experience for you
I don't hate Chelsea, I just think your manager and your owner and a lot of your players are bellends It's not like I always want you to lose, you play Man Utd at least twice a year
Considering how much you all loved your CL win, there should be no criticism of how West Ham played. Wonder how Jose will set up v City. Could he be trying to trick Pellegrini into thinking he'll attack City?
Relying on Messi to miss a penalty and Torres to luckily be in position for a counter attack because he was too lazy to track back does not compare to West Ham. While they had less ambition they were at least organised
It was made clear a long time ago that you are an imbicile and this post just topped anything you've ever said. Well done. Organised? We had 38 shots. They were lucky we couldn't finish last night, end of story. Now seriously, **** off, you contribute nothing to this thread/forum/sport. Such a bitter little man.
9 shots. The 29 others were either blocked by good organised defending or were off target due to pressure.
They were good in defence, no denying it. I thought Collins and Tomkins in particular were outstanding. However, had Oscars shot that hit the bar after 8 minutes gone in, we'd have got 3 or 4. Just one of those games were you need an early goal and unfortunately we didn't manage to get one.
I fully expect Maureen to not be a hypocrite now and send out his team to really go at Man City, a nice open game with flowing football from both sides. ... But we all know you will park the bus and try for a smash and grab.
