Calling someone a liar and implying they're operating in a self centred manner is as insulting as it is inaccurate. I've already said that the threads are mixed up with others and I wouldn't sort them if if I thought it was worth it. Asking again and again is just pointless, especially as the issue doesn't really affect you. Better than what you suggest, the supermods would act if I was anywhere near behaving as your insults imply. Dross is removed quite often. Despite your ill informed claims, this was no different. Save you angst for one that happens that you were involved in.
I was involved as was Carmine and Lewis29; is there any other facts you would like to corrupt? No matter how canny you are you canny get away with bending the facts - well you tell us Allam canny so why can you?
Gosh, is using 'canny' supposed to get a reaction? I'd guessed you would. Is that uncanny or what? Ah, I see your error. You think, 'being involved' is jumping in and trying to muddy the waters after the event. You also seem to think I'm not allowed an opinion. You also seem to ignore the others that have voiced the self and same opinion. I wonder where the issue really is here. You seem to believe it's fine for you to insult people, even trying to play it down, and you think it's fine for you to be offended on behalf of someone else. I've no idea what you're hoping to achieve by any of this, other than a hope that some of your mud sticks. What you seem to ignore is that the bulk of board users don't post, when asked they said it's because of tedious ****e like this and the crap (including mine) that disrupted the other threads. Threads were cleared of disruptive posts as they often are. If they weren't, the same people complaining about them being deleted would be complaining that they hadn't. Get over it. If it was as you claim, it'd stand out and others would act. No facts bent, no lies and no self seeking acts on my part. Quite the opposite. The next thing that happens on these threads where I correct the attempts at revisionism is someone says "can't you two get a room". (c) Mystic dog.
I can't be arsed to read most of this but you were out of order last night and the other night with Carmine Dutch. Both times you were made to look a bit of a twat and you proceeded to delete the thread both times once it was apparent to all that you were just being a bellend. You contradict yourself so much and refuse to acknowledge it so often. Like when you said you don't know carmine and don't recognise his username, then 10 posts later said that you were always getting complaints about carmine. Which is it? Neither I suspect.
You should have used your time to read the posts rather than just churning out tosh that's been replied to in this and other threads.
Like what exactly? This thread is now 2 pages of huge posts. So do you recognise Carmine's username or not? Considering he's a 'usual suspect' and you apparently always get complaints about his posts (hard to believe) you must do, but you claim not. Answer that.
****ing hell, are you female dragging back other ****e that's done to death at the time? The board is more than just the people that post. People have commented on and off the board that this sort of ****e stops them posting. People complain when threads are pulled and almost the same people complain when they're not both times they think lies and abuse are acceptable ways of communicating, as is ignoring answers that show why what they claim doesn't happen.
Just answer the question Dutch, do you not recognise Carmine's username, or is he a usual suspect who you receive lots of complaints about?
Here we go again yet another post degenerating into a slanging match between posters. You tossers have just proved my point admirably
It's a perfectly good question and it's no bastardisation. They are two things you said quite clearly yourself.
Spot on. You want to try it from this side. It's as boring as sin. The same people whine no matter what's done and then try changing the truth to justify it. "Too many posts moved - not enough posts moved" It produces more complaints and stops more people joining discussions than most other issues. We clear as many as we can, but that just tends to produce more threads ab
No they're not. Short answer - I didn't know Carmen had gone, so would hardly notice he's back. People complained on and off the board about the same people hunting daft arguments, especially with me, and screwing threads up. His name was one of a number mentioned on different occasions for doing it.
That's not the issue Dutch. The problem is you get yourself into these petty squabbles then just delete them as soon as you start looking a fool. Getting into squabbles is fine by me but when you use your moderator status to relieve you of embarrassment that's stepping over the line. If any of the rest of us make a tit of ourselves, we can't delete all the posts concerning it, and you don't do it for us, so why should you deem it acceptable to do it yourself.
Nope, they're deleted only when they disrupt the board. People choose to ignore two obvious replies that keep being made to that allegation. One is, the threads exist where people make the allegation, which kind of pisses on the claim. There are checks and balances which mean that would stand out and be acted on if there was any truth in it. The reality is, it's the usual suspects that gain most from their petty disruptions being pruned to benefit the other bored board users.
