No it's not, it's disagreeing with someone's views. I don't hate people because of where they are born, but when they are thick enough to do so then yes, they can **** right off
They can have their ****ing views, its these marches that piss me off. All they're doing is creating problems and costing tax-money, so they can get pissed in the streets, start a few fights with the police and sing some anti-islamic songs.
They are perfectly entitled to their viewpoints, just like we're entitled to go on the internet and call them a pack of functionally ******ed bell-ends. The only difference is we're actually right.
What about the terrorist Islamics that up until recently were allowed to spout forth their "racist" tirades against Christianity and western civilisation in general - I'm thinking primarily of The Claw in London - what are your views on that Mr Toby? If I'm for free speech I would say it should be allowed. What is your opinion and viewpoint? This could prove mighty interesting on the analysis of your thought processes.
Has banning it stopped it from happening? Anyway, you're shooting off an tangents, we all have the right to demnstrate and that is a fundamental right of every citizen of this country, regardless of how ******ed they may be.
From my own point of view if anyone sings or chants something that is racially aggressive they should be arrested and charged. Freedom of speech does not allow you to spout forth any old crap.
True but what are they demonstrating against? Nothing. They just spout a load of Daily Mail ****e and get pissed, whilst creating more problems in the Muslim community. **** them
ST I'm not supporting the EDL. I couldnt give a **** what they do or what their views are. Although I do like the way they get up peoples noses such are yourself
Coming from someone who associates himself with a club and it's fans that have been known for their pro-IRA stance and the terrorism and erosion of civil rights that that has on people of a certain viewpoint that is quite laughable. Secondly I have not said I support the EDL - a pathetic assumption on your part - I said they were entitled to voice their opinion. You advocate free speech so long as it concurs with your viewpoints which ultimately means that you are not interested in free speech at all. Time to have a good look at yourself.
