What's the benefit to me in doing that? Just to satisfy some pathetic obsessed Mag who's slavering over his 10 year old second hand laptop If he places his £1000, I'll post a photo of me driving into Monaco in a Porsche Carrera GT which is worth over half a million quid. (BTW, Enterprise don't have one I could borrow.) To prove it's me I'll post another photo of me at the semi-final
Yep....Some mag **** calls you out and wants a picture...Idon't wanna see ya ugly grid, so just politletly tell him to **** off cos he's a mag gregg eating, horse punching, dole walla ****.
And, as always, backs down when you accept .......... they try to embarrass you but can't see it's them who end up on their arse.
If I had £1000 in spare cash to put into an escrow account I would be paying off some more of the mortgage not using it to prove a point against a man who thinks he's the bees knees because he can't shut up about being in the top 200 richest men in the world. Put it this way, the 200th richest man in the world would never even mention the fact on the internet because random strangers would be so unimportant to him....yet you go one step further and actually base your username on it Oh and the irony of you questioning my use of smileys, you use one in nearly every post
Mate...you're no fool. You pick and choose your fights. You met your match earlier in the thread when Paulo's pecs put you in your place....and what did you do? The exact thing that you seem to despise, just totally ignored him and acted like the comment had never happened. Fail.
Full of ****.. Now i never talk about money or wealth, it's not me. But face facts, some people don't have mortgages etc.
I've never said that you mug BTW, I ****ing knew you wouldn't have the bollocks to back up your claims that I'm a liar, ****ing knew it and so did you
So there's lie number 1. And you could easily prove that your "story" is true, but everything has to be financial to you. You're obsessed with it man. Even if you are rich, which I highly doubt, you are clearly an empty man. Now onto lie number 2: That post from Paulo's pecs got no reply from you, and you claim it never happened at all. Embarrassing on your behalf, sultan.
I was replying to loads of posts and missed that one ........ means nowt, I posted the thread deliberately to rile people up. He took offence and replied. He didn't put me in my place at all, he said nowt different to other people that I did reply to.
**** of Smug you have never been so wrong!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ken Dodd could tell the funniest original joke in the World and I would struggle to smile. I hate the unfunny **** with a passion! AS to the OP, loved it and all the bleeding hearts whining. The only one's who could get upset by it are the ones who were writing off MY club after a few games of the season. I was pissed off as anyone at our bad start, but never wrote the team off. We were playing some good football under PDC let down by serious individual errors, that PDC was stupid enough to be honest about and name names. (Me I agreed with him lambasting the ****ers and when you actually think back the ****ers made the effort to change their lackadaisical ways.) Poyet has came in and the team has continued to improve and we have been extremely unlucky in a lot of games. There are still areas where I can see we need to improve both tactically and player wise and I'm still going to have a moan about individuals being ****e or errors made by the manager. But I wont write off MY team until it is mathematically impossible to stay up.
Listen carefully, I will say this only once very slowly for you so you might understand..What Smug stated was he has mixed with the richest 200 people in the world, which is very different from saying he is one of them.
You should let Smug know it isn't a good idea having a bet with the Mags too as they are well known for welching on bets on here. And Durham Slag is hardly the sharpest tool in the box. A tool he definitely is mind.
To be one of the 200 richest men in the world I'd have to be worth over a billion and would be dictating my irritating slaver to a bikini clad typist
I always try to respond, in kind, to any responses on a thread but must have missed yours, so I'll do it now. I was going on like a ****er deliberately in response to the kind of people who come on here sniping at optimists after a defeat. I was mimicking the kind of hysterical ****e that they love to post and hoped people would realise that ........... perhaps it was too subtle for people. Whatever the case I was seeking to ask a very basis question .......... why is it OK for some people to gripe at those who keep the faith and not the other way round? You know as well as I do that some people would've been all over this board if we'd been beaten 4-1 taking the piss out of optimists like myself. So, Pecs, what gives them the right to do that but whinge when they get some thrown back at them? As I said, if you don't snipe and take the piss, out of people, then I'm not referring to you ......... so what's the problem? I wasn't trying to be controversial, I believe what I posted even though I hyped it up deliberately. To make it clear, I was having a pop at anyone who takes the piss out of the club or the supporters. Where did I ever mention that my opinion was 'worth more than everyone else's' ............ I'd like to see that if you don't mind pointing it out.
If starting a thread titled "**** off" and then aiming that abusive statement directly at many of your own fans isn't controversial then tell us, what is? You knew exactly the reaction you would get even from those it wasn't intended towards and posted it fully intending to get into many arguments over it. We had just won 4-1 away from home and seen AJ score a well overdue hat trick and yet you chose this moment to drive a wedge between supporters not unify us in our joy. Its 'your thing' to cause more fights than handshakes on here and you have plenty form for offering to 'meet people round the back for a dust up' if they don't agree with you. You constantly like to tell everyone how successful you are and how you mix with the rich and famous in that sunny and idyllic climate and yet everything about your persona on this forum suggests you are not really a happy person with yourself. You come across far too bitter and full of anger to be comfortable in such exalted company and in return to have such company be at ease with you, which is a real genuine shame, as you can often be a very amusing and post some very intelligent contributions to these pages. I for one enjoy some of your comments (not all mind) about us and other clubs in general. We as fans all like debate (thats why we come on here) but will never agree on all things and to be fair, the perilous state of the club this season had many of us depressed and despondent. Having witnessed 8 relegations in my 40 years, I think it was pretty evident that relegation under PDC was an absolute cast iron certainty, just as many thought it was under MoN. I now believe both sentiments to be probably true and with 1 point form the first 8 games, I feel it wasn't just the doomsayers that were posting on here thinking we would be relegated but rather many very concerned and passionate fans who just wanted change. We should all now feel incredibly relieved that Gus has taken up the challenge here, a relief you didn't exactly extend by telling a huge portion of them to '**** off' did you? You are no more loyal or passionate than the next supporter Smug but I do get the feeling in your mind at least, you really do think you are 'the' most passionate and 'the' most loyal in the world. I'm afraid to tell you you're not. Sunderland AFC is an institution that belongs to everyone, not the individual and I welcome EVERY loyal fans opinion, even if at times I will passionately voice my opinions in contradiction to them. You got EXACTLY what you sought in opening this thread and cannot be surprised that there have been many voices telling you that you were wrong to start it with such language. Keep posting the good stuff we all appreciate and lay off this kind of post in future and this forum will be all the better for it.
Be a ****ing man and finish this one then. Is that right? I seemed ok with my own opinion before Smug started posting regular. Remember? When you used to cry like a little bitch about your right of opinion just because I disagreed with you and backed it with a well constructed argument like I'm doing now and always do. Just to blow that little petty comment of yours out of the water completely. Post #3 on this very thread is my copy and paste of my comment on this thread. http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/245150-Time-to-get-behind-The-Lads-at-home Posted a full 21 minutes before this thread was published. It's nothing more than a coincidence that our views match on this matter and that is a fact. To prove we don't always agree here. http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/244738-Bridcutt-Request-DENIED! Just because you're off and on the band wagon more times then my lass has been on and off the rag in her entire life, doesn't mean I'm a kiss arse for having an opinion with staying power that happens to agree with another poster who's opinions also have staying power.
