Same with Azelle Rodney, Pearce Jordan etc etc etc. I'm not saying the cos are always wrong. But a lot of those cases stink. edit: and this one does too.
Aye... I suppose you're right. Let's close all the courts and turn them into Mosque's, Lidl's and Lazer Quests.
True....although your chances of gettin' smoked by some trigger happy Fed just out of Hendon who couldn't tell the difference between a metal detector and an Uzi would increase exponentially....
Bleep bleep bleep bleep....faduum faduum* * one to the head, one to the chest. Silencer on..... For some reason.
And to think...if he had survived the shooting he would have been given a suspended sentence like the army sniper was
So as they work as firearm officers, they can shoot people, because they have a stressful job? That's such a feeble excuse. You're ignoring the fact that a man, presumed guilty but with no actual evidence, was shot dead. His background/race/etc have nothing to do with my point, it's ****ed that the police there that night can get away with it. They lied a lot about what happened that night too, it took an inquest to come up with what was probably partially the truth, but only told by one side. He probably was a ****, but that doesn't give the police the right to shoot who they feel like.
"Misguided outrage by liberals"...this guy was murdered with impunity. You do not have to be a liberal to believe that shooting unarmed civilians is outrageous.
He was a gun carrying gangster, there is no "probably" about it. I LOLed at the news when they showed his mum saying "he never would have done anyone any harm".
The polis are a bunch of ****s, populated with fannies who've watched too many Hollywood movies. The worst of it is is that they know they can get away with cases like this because they can interfere with the process and employ tactics that influence the public and, more importantly, juries.
I gave you a perfectly polite reponse , you decided to put words in my mouth hence my response. I repeat, YOU were not there
