It was awkward because your correction wasn't correct. Stop trying to be superior because it can make you look foolish.
you are right .. it should be ten-year-old at least am not english .. and 10 years old .. what is your excuse?
hmm just typed it as you wrote it in google .. all "10-year-old" or "ten-year-old" ok may be i will find one exactly like the one you posted by page 100 nahh most be whole world are wrong only you right
Chelsea. They already have a large legion of plastics which discolour the small proportion of pre-Abramovic fans.
sure my correction was wrong, but the way he wrote google search disagree on it too it is "10-year-old" or "ten-year-old" according to google and yeahhh am the child here posting like maniacs on other club board in a daily bases since we started to lose ... but when we were wining you were crying like cowards chickens between your mummy's boobs and never dared to show as often posting this ***** about UTD..
To be fair to Shwan. In this post, at least, I think he could be right. A boy can be ten years old, just like a football club can be 100 years old. It is only when the age is a modifier that it becomes compounded. A ten-year-old boy. So Shwan is not "stuck on this".