I read the thread on the Huddleboard that sparked this. I don't think Thomson has accurately described the nature of it in my opinion. It was certainly crass...but threatening. I don't reckon so. Much like a lot of stuff on here and GC could be described in the same way. She isn't even on there as far as I know.... And I have nothing but contempt for her drivel. Celtic â Scotlandâs modern Millwall? You can only hope that things will change if enough people point out the bleedinâ obvious: shiny new Glasgow, city of the Commonwealth Games, needs to take a long hard look at itself and try to come into the 21st century. I refer to Glasgowâs bizarre blindness to racism, bigotry and all manner of criminal activity which would scarcely be tolerated in any other British city outside N Ireland. Yet, in and around Glasgow itâs scarcely noticed. But like I say, if enough people call it out things can change. Nobody around the West Coast seemed to think David Limondâs foul online racist bigotry and intimidation of a woman was odd, or wrong, or unusual. Still less, racist. In fact it was clearly criminal and eventually Police Scotland were able to act when Channel 4 News gave them evidence they couldnât refuse. And now one at least of the Ibrox Underclass is awaiting sentence for racially and religiously aggravated online intimidation. Yes â racially. The victim here is not black, sheâs of Irish descent. But racism is racism in fact, in reality, in law â however blind important sections of Glasgow remain to this reality. So the racial element makes it obviously a landmark, groundbreaking prosecution. So groundbreaking in fact that it was all but ignored by the Glasgow-dominated Scottish media. You really do have to wonder why? Theyâll have another chance this week when Limond is sentenced in Ayr. Will they take it? So quite rightly Police Scotland are on a roll here. Theyâve successfully taken the law to online criminality. Itâs a significant step. But thereâs more to be done. A lot more. Right now, for instance, the police should be very interested in Celticâs underclass doing much the same thing as Limond. I know for certain at least one key detective involved in the Limond case already has evidence. Huddleboard & Celticâs increasingly toxic image Take, for example, the site known as the Huddleboard. This purports to be a fansâ forum where people come and sound off from behind their keyboards in relative anonymity, brave men that they are â and they are mostly men it seems. Fair enough, passion and free speech and all that. Except that those running this site either donât seem to know or care that comment is one thing, crime is another. Hot on the success of prosecuting Limond the excellent detectives of Police Scotland may well now be taking a close interest in Huddleboard and those who run it. In reality Huddleboard is just another facet of the increasingly toxic public image of Celtic. The Seville days are ancient history. Like a bully with no natural competitors (though Rangers are on their way back), the Celtic of today is rightly gaining a reputation for the most consistently violent fans in the UK who attack stadiums as if weâre living in 1974. They are Scotlandâs modern Millwall: an underclass of extreme politics and mindless violence â the same old toxic brew. Thatâs the Celtic Underclass on tour. The same cancer is reflected online. On Huddleboard for instance in recent days. Open threats Here so-called Celtic âsupportersâ openly threaten precisely the same journalist as Limond did. They threaten her with blatant physical and sexual assault for doing her job. Itâs disgusting and laughably stupid â and yes guys â deleting any of it now is far far too late. Even in the unlikely case of it being Rangers âfansâ on the stir, it is apparently being tolerated by the people moderating and running the site who bear responsibility in law. The details of the criminals engaged in this vile, inadequate idiocy will be known to those running the site. Their details are logged. And no, you canât delete them either. Should they wish not to give such information to Police Scotland they will place themselves in an interesting position legally. I have good reason to suppose the police may well soon require such information and rightly so. Hiding behind having a server in the US is unlikely to hold up before a determined and professional police force. Hiding and huddling â not exactly heroic. I would advise the Huddleboard moderators to start moderating, publicly apologise for the criminality that has been published by fans and wipe this stuff from their output forever in future â though it may well be too late for that, legally speaking. Calling time on Glasgowâs culture Yet again, alongside Limond the obvious criminality on this site is startlingly clear to an outsider yet around Glasgow of course few even appear to notice. But this is now. New Year. 21st Century. Post-Limond. Police aware. If Glasgow cultureâs still stuck in early twentieth century tolerance of this filth, there are many outwith Clydeside who are not, and are calling time on you, here and now. There are many well-moderated Scottish football sites run by grown-ups who can distinguish between a comment and a crime â The Scottish Football Monitor is one. Huddleboard is not one. And just as Rangers should have publicly condemned Limondâs criminality what of you Celtic? What do you say about a website tolerating comments threatening physical and sexual assault against a woman journalist who simply pointed the finger at your violent, hate-filled underclass?
I read the first few paragraphs, convinced you'd posted this in the wrong place. It reads like Leggat's work, no?
It does rather. complete bollocks. The most consistently violent fans in the U.K......sweet sufferin ****
Over the top it may be, but increasingly down here in england more and mire people getting the impression celtic fans are trouble makers because of sheer number of times we been in the news because of the conduct of our fans. People remember the bad more than the good. Our reputation is **** now thanks to a very small idiotic minority
I don't think our reputation is ****. Peter Lawwell will be the first number folk call if someone is in need of a testimonial. Our reputation won't be affected by this nonsense one way or another I wouldn't have thought. The small idiotic minority..... One of them being Angela Haggerty? This isn't the idiotic minority. That's pretty much every supporter of every club.
Looks like Sumdy's fallen out of the whitabout-tree and hit every branch on the way down. please log in to view this image
Where were threats of violence on that?? That Chris Graham is a right window licker anyway. I remember him on Twitter around the time they went bump and he just chats ****, trying to make out he is in the know! There was a brilliant tweet when they were appealing something (transfer ban or something like that) and by about 10pm there was no word from the SFA as to the outcome.....this bellend tweets how he has been informed there will be no outcome announced that day.....5 minutes later the SFA announced their decision
Things got a bit misogynistic-y and the reference to a size 9 doesn't come across so great....but in the context of a football forum it's pretty much par for the course. Certainly not to warrant a piece like that. Odd that he would write a piece to order though. I'd suspect Haggerty has his ear as well to prompt it. He wants to **** with people and he's done it to Graham before with a piece on conflicts of interest..... The references to the racist abuse Haggerty got make it a OSABATO piece that strikes Graham's club too, so not entirely the "look at Those bad Celtic fans" that Graham would have wanted.
I had to go to his blog to double-check he had actually posted the above. It's certainly an exaggerated piece to have come up with, especially with the "threats of violence". It would appear, at least to me, that he's making some feeble attempt to even up the stakes having spent 18 months writing about the buns and being chastised, berated and insulted for being "one-sided". Probably makes it even harder to ignore when spazzys like Chris Graham begin tweeting you Yeah, there's definitely an aggressive ***** side to the Celtic support, albeit small, but to compare kicking seats in to sending bombs or actually making threats in which the police have to contact people and post coppers outside their house, is taking it a bit too far. It's pretty clear that saying, "she deserves a boot in the fanny" is the direct equivalent of saying, "he deserves a boot in the baws". Can't see Thomson writing a blog on that, though. Ultimately though, as Anportmorbhoy says, folk remember the bad more than the good and several incidents of our fans causing or being in trouble (banners, fighting, stadium damage, chants etc) sticks in the mind a lot more than getting a good result against Barcelona or making the last 16 in the CL.
Thompson is a hack at the end of the day, compared to Damien Day from DropTDD yesterday and to be fair his blog is no different from 'Thugs and Thieves'. What I think is more interesting is that the Cult of Phil has taken a deserved kicking (not literally Alex) over this For the rebel journalist to ignore calls for his opinion on the whole article, and he was discussing the bits he wanted to, reeks of the same type of churnalism he is happy to accuse other writers of being guilty of. He shouts about a moral compass, while forgetting he tried to do business with The Sun Stick to Sevco stories Phil
A clear form of Biological Urban Terrorism. Next she'll be getting a size 9 Reebok Classic sent to her home too. A viable device, if i'm not mistaken, that could be used to boot her in her lady baws.
So I take it Thomson is getting moved off the "enemies of rangers" list onto the "enemies of celtic" list?
Yes, he's using Graham as his consultant, Graham being an expert on enemies, like the Vespa Bar and so on.