That's fair enough. But I think the supermods tend to get a bit touchy about jackarmy. net as we've had some problems here from some of thier posters. This certainly doesn't apply to all I hasten to add. I can understand the annoyance at having a post edited but I think orders have come from on high when it comes to jackarmy. net. Not my job to defend the mods but i think that may be it.
Not that bothered whether you mention thejackarmy site or not ..... KDA has done a great job with it & those that use it seem happy The only thing I find strange is when reading Bovi comments on there he slags us off at every opportunity & yet he keep coming back on here for more .... seems a bit odd to me
Minxy - I stand corrected. I think the mods should just be allowed to well, mod. I don't always agree with them but hey that's their call not mine. Thankless bloody job - particularly here.
No need to apologise Valley may be under the same impression as you as I have never discussed it with him ..... Never had reason to & I'm only giving my opinion ..... brb my feel differently If I was Valley with all the hassle he has taken I would probably ban anyone who even mentions the site. After all they have banned folk off here who they see as trouble makers
Still blowing the same crap out of your arse I see. As for destroying the forum, you seem intent on doing that yourself with your moaning all the time.
No moaning here just stating facts. Your the sole reason a lot don't post here so much, that's the truth . I'm not here often enough to have any kind of influence but you are ! Anyway who cares ,it's only a poxy Internet forum isn't it ?
That 'Reply with Quote' function is fast becoming my love-to-hate thing here. If people prefer the debate on jackarmy why are they here? Only to cause problems and moan about this one "going downhill" it seems. I think most people have no problem with belonging to multiple forums but if you don't like this one why come here? Recent activity by said moaners gives you the answer.
I post on both boards with no problems (unless of course I'm on ignore and if so how would I know, accepting that Dai never responds back to a question that is ).If I remember to not post with quote then so be it ,if I forget then put me on ignore .This could get messy
Open and honest...initially i never had a problem with the Jack site, evident in why the thread lasted so long on here. Normally promotion stuff gets removed i won't deny but if something is liked by the community who am i to interfere. I assume the owners of this Jack site must be known by the Swansea supporters, maybe by some personally, hence its popularity. Something run by known supporters is always going to have an added attraction. However, it shouldn't be allowed to become disruptive for multi users who wish to continue to use this site. I'm sure the Jack site have written rules that must depict the same. So why should administrators allow something here that administrators would not allow on the new Jack site. It's about board manners and i find it strange when new members join up and rather than discussing the Swans want to turn attention to administrators within a few posts. Everyone has a choice here or somewhere else or maybe both, let people make their choice without passive aggression accounts, because the administration rules are no different here as they are there. Maybe you might disagree...then maybe i should also create a fake persona on the Jack site and see how long i last, behaving the same as newbies do on here, or maybe i'm already in there testing their resolve...who knows...find me if you can guys
I have nothing but respect for Valley You're doing a great job whilst taking a lot of unnecessary crap.
