So, in a vote and agm that all sides agree is utterly critical to the future of his club, Ally decides that as a major shareholder he will let someone else decide how to vote? Aye, the man has balls of steel right enough
The point is, maybe Ally feels the fans have more of a right to have a say in how the club is run than an individual (Ally McCoist). It's not a difficult concept to understand.
Why don't you make me? Do you want to see what happens when you try to make me? please log in to view this image
I'm not saying it's a difficult concept. I'm saying I think it's baws. The man has no strength of conviction and is wimping out from stating an opinion and his preferences. He was publicly "undecided" about voting just a few days ago and now he has a "long-standing agreement" to give a proxy vote to the fans? Convenient. To be perfectly honest, it doesn't concern me in the slightest how anyone votes in your agm. I couldn't name any of your current board apart from Stockbridge and maybe two of your 'rebels' (the Murrays). It's just funny to have you all blindly leaping to super sally's defence.
But it is clear how McCoist wants his vote to be used. If he was to vote how he wants to, then he would be out of a job. He is protecting himself and his employment, which any sane person would do. Obviously with being a taig you have never worked a day in your life, so I wouldn't expect to grasp this.
Fuxxake, now anyone will be able to track us down on facebook, Ive told you before no personal pics !!!!!
Keep up your nonsense and I'll post the pictures I took up at Coocaddens when you were back over recently.
So he's being a coward. Too afraid to pull the trigger himself, he's passing the gun to someone else. The man who got his 1m shares for a penny each, whilst the fans had to pay 75p, is protecting his £825k p/a job (for managing a 3rd tier scottish side). Your financially-stricken club certainly needs heroes like this, rather than the spivs who're simply taking the money out the club Racist / sectarian abuse? Tsk.
