Bull****. You had no intention of a decent discussion on your board earlier today. Double standards indeed.
Hey Ho - the Bletchley Park lot were out in force last night - their bloody Enigma machines must have been red hot...... Don't forget to change every 5th letter to the one previous in the alphabet, and invert every other "m" to make it a "w". Then count the number of vowels and multiply it by the number of full stops. The square root of the difference between that and the total number of letters will give you the real meaning. Fck me, it's so damn hard being a stealth spy these days.......
Mods: You do realise that I was banned twice from the Cardiff board for a fraction of what our resident Redtit is doing? The last occasion was for what I might say in the future. Didn't we say we weren't going to tolerate wums? We've had insults flying around with phrases like "up each other's arses" and "it was to do with the trash posted by jerks like you" and so on. All very unsavoury and it's completely derailed the thread. When was the last time Pablo was mentioned? As Ivor says, it's dross - and if it was a Swans fan he'd have been banned by now. Norway and others have him pegged. He makes out he only wants to discuss football but he's your classic stealth wummer - the worst kind. Mainly because he's not bright enough to carry it off convincingly. As the thread developed, slowly but surely his true colours came out, and it all began when I politely told him to "lighten up" a bit when he snapped at Vetch for no reason. At least with Hughs what you see is what you get. NJ: Am I an 'old stager' ? That did make me laugh
I personally have no problem with wums, well unless they wum to the extent of how JH used to wum, or how far Swamp took it a few weeks back. Yes I could say I would have a quiet word with him for taking it off topic, but, then I would also be saying that to a few Jacks also, who have derailed it just as much. As for any unsavoury stuff being said, it seems pretty much heading both ways, so I have seen it as 50/50 sort of thing. Such as your "he is not bright" comment, sorry but if you cannot take it, don't dish it. I have always been of the opinion that this is an open forum, I always argued over on the Cardiff board about biased treatment, I also stood up for you on there too, and I am no hypocrite, so I will not mod this board as if it's ours alone. Differential treatment is something I do not agree with. So tell me, should I really ban any user who has posted an unsavoury comment in this topic? or not? Also in regards to the Cardiff board, I myself was banned there, but doesn't mean I am going to ban Cardiff fans for a bit of a wum, or swans fans for a bit of a wum, as I mentioned before, there are different types of wums. And although some don't like Sparkey, he isn't a nasty wum, he isn't someone who derails multiple threads, he has posted tin this thread, to which both himself and fellow jacks have sent it off topic. So no I won't ban Sparkey. Not until he does something I think warrants a ban, and same goes for anyone else. EDIT: damn this poxy database error crap, sorry if this comes out multiple times. Oh wait, I can delete my posts never mind
Now look Swansa, I don't want any special treatment over here, it might upset some of the natives. You do what you see fit. I see Aussie's had the stealth code books out again - get over yourself, you big girls blouse........ Don't know whether it's me or the site, but I've had difficulties getting back on to reply. I did wonder if all this stealthing stuff had overloaded my laptop... You started all this "dross" with your confrontational post telling me to lighten up - who the hell do you think you are on here, somone special? I sorted out any issue (unintentional) with VETCH who might have taken what I posted the wrong way, and he came back with a "no problem" reply. There was no problem. I've just re-read the thread from the top and Swansea posters and I were talking about the subject matter and the difference (or not) Pablo would make - bang on subject. In you steam with your usual crap telling other posters what to do - you tried to derail it earlier by telling me the OP had only included the "pushing on and climbing the table" remark as a throwaway line. Campioni then blew you out of the water saying it was certainly not, and your whole argument collapsed. You're still the same as years ago, I can read you like a book. In with the aggression, and then pout like a spoiled brat when you get put down. When you can't get your own way, the hurt really shows. You try to ridicule the target by quoting other posters remarks that promote your position and getting the gang together to join in. Rabble rouser extraordinaire..... For goodness sake grow up you spoilt little childish brat.....oops sorry, I deserve a ban for that. Chico, Graduate and Swansa - your duty calls. Rid this site of visiting posters who challenge the exalted ones on here with a bit of their own medicine. In the meantime, how did Pablo do last night - serious question.
Swanselona: whether you personally have a problem with wums is irrelevant. Completely irrelevant. Our forum rules include that posters must not derail threads and that includes wumming off-topic. Frankly I don't give a flying **** what you personally think about that. Them's the rules as they say. If you think the rules haven't been repeatedly breached then you are wrong. Period. Whatever happened to the zero tolerance we recently spoke of here - or did you miss that particular debate? I'm not getting into an argument with you on this - either ****ing apply the rules or don't. But you're creating a rod for everyone's back by wantin to appear fair minded. I've seen it before, and the boundaries will be pushed. They have already with his last post above - because he can see you won't do anything. Well if anything goes.... It goes to show that we are more tolerant than your board, Sparkey. Unfortunately. Even though you admit "challenging" us. A curious term for someone who "only wants to discuss football". So transparent. You're really not that clever are you? But I'm not going to reply to your rather nasty diatribe above. Unlike some sad crusty little ****ers living in Snoozetown I have a life and don't spend my time ****ing off to getting a rise out of people. I'll leave you all to discuss Pablo - because I'm sure you're really interested and I'm equally sure others will fall for your ****. 6 pages of rubbish on a decent thread and all from one innocuous comment from me that Mr Sensitive thought was "confrontational". No doubt we'll speak soon because I'm also certain you'll be back for more so you can toss off.
Back for more Aussie. The discussion about Pablo was going great with many other Swansea posters - and then you came along to stick your oar in. Read it from the start. The later degeneration on the thread was a result of your intervention. It turned very light hearted as far as I was concerned with some decent (if totally off topic) banter. I even said at some point (can't be arsed to look again) that I thought the OP topic was lost because of it. If you mods think I'm wrong, then ban me - I won't be offended.
Yes you bloody are !! but i mean in forum terms not in real life ,we are ll eternally young in real life despite the date on the birth certificate ...
Then they should apply them Sprucie. Personal stances shouldn't cloud the application of fair moderation. If I am deemed to be causing the problem rather than just contributing to a cross board football forum with all that entails, then they should do it. I understand there's a forum for one-club comments where this sort of thing can't happen - why don't the offended just piss off there to avoid the chat?
Because thats what you want and im not in the buisness of giving you what you want Even though there are plenty of sensible Jacks on here that see right through you i will take great personal pleasure in following you around making sure you follow the rules, i might even bring a few of my friends with me, just to piss you off and ask "how did pablo do " of course ...
I must also add that the other forum is great for talking about the Swans with fellow swans, plenty of objectional opinion on there and the debate is much better as there arnt as many stealth wums who want to de rail threads and serve other agendas . C
Righteo then Aussie, so are you ok if I request a ban for Sparkey and yourself, who can be seen to have derailed a thread, and sent out insults. Also may even look closely to asking for a ban for DPJ and Vech for also sending the thread off topic. Now what to do, can I please have your insight dear Aussie, tell me what to do. *end sarcasm*
Oops Swansa - sorry, just saw your post. I think that's a very reasonable stance and I would accept it if the others you mentioned did as well.
Your club appear to have an unhealthy interest in that sort of thing , I suppose you join in with the rest signing your version of Hymns & Aries with great gusto .
