Simpler than that. The meeting will play on words as WJ described it. I describe it as conning the punters. Nothing will change and we could post exactly the same pages all over again. They will still be appropriate until the problem leaves the board.
So I was right! Pure specuation based on the opinion of social media keyboard warriors. I know you can't attend in person, Josh, but have you thought of listening in online to the LUST meeting tomorrow? Or does the thought of hearing the other side of the argument, plus solid fact, make you panic?
Hearing anything does not make it fact. We were promised irrefutable documentary evidence over a year ago. Many of us will tune in, but only so we get to see GC peddling the same old stuff with nothing concrete to back it up. You are so blinkered you cannot understand that we are sick of rhetoric and want to SEE the proof of what was said last year.
You're quite wrong on this on, Glory! I'm not blinkered. I've attended meetings, listened, and been quite vocal when I needed to. My professional training ensures that I assume nothing and challenge everything. Bit of a millstone in my personal life at times, but that's the way I've been shaped over the years.
So forgetting what you were told, you have seen the documents that confirm lusts claims irrefutably. So that when the likes of David Haigh says things never happened you can be 100% certain he is not being honest with the press! the wider board and other aquaintances? If you have seen them I presume GC will get them online tomorrow and then we can look forward to the court case.
My understanding from when I was last involved in a discussion is that the documents are still lodged with an independant solicitor. The reason that they have not been published is that they may compromise some people (potential investors as I recall hazily). Now this is my recollection, and it may not be 100% accurate. I prefer not to answer such questions for LUST - why not ask the questions yourself tomorrow evening, in person or via the web? One thing that puzzles me though, Glory, is that you tell us that you've attended a number of LUST meetings. Why did you not take the opportunity then to ask your questions of the board? I've been to 3 meetings myself, and I'm pretty sure this subject was covered at all 3. So were you really there, and do you really want answers to your questions? Forgetting the missed opportunities for a moment, you have a blinding opportunity to prove LUST wrong on worldwide record for all to hear. JFDI !!!!
We will have been at two of the same meetings. I thought we were being lied to by GC last year and I said so here, you shouted me down. But the meeting would would IMO have become very uncivilised if I had said what I thought on the night. GC is reading this thread and knows what it's going to take to even start fixing this mess. I don't need to ask the questions or request the proof. BS has asked the questions, what needs to happen now is for GC to answer them and provide the proof. Are you a betting man?
Is this the David Haigh who's always supported scum or the one who's always supported Leeds? Tory speak with forked tongue - on record too!!
So you had ample opportunity to question the board at the meeting, delined then started a troll campaign. If that's not the definition of a keyboard warrior, what is? Am I a betting man? No, but if I was, I'd bet you prefer to sit behind your keyboard moaning than to grasp opportunitie that present themselves to you. And that is based on FACT, via your own keyboard & words. So why should I take you seriously?
I grasp many opportunities thanks. I am not using a keyboard. I asked questions and supplementary ones but still didn't see any proof or believe the answers. Then my patience ran out. You should take me seriously because I am right on this.
It's laughable that possibly 10 people on a forum are able to get the attention of the chairman of a supporter's club to answer them. I don't see not606 as a representative sample of Leeds supporters so the claims on here are a bit daft. I also don't equate non-membership of something with hatred of that thing. I'm not a member of the "I'd like to shag Susanna Reid" club, but that's a long way off from "I wouldn't touch her with a bargepole" But the content of some of the accusations may be valid. For answers from LUST's point of view, go to the AGM or listen in. That's what should be good about forums, it's all about opinions and interpretation of facts and issues. With LUST, it seems some have gone a little overboard without real evidence
When can we have our all white kit back? Does LUST have any influence on this? I'd say the overall majority of Leeds fans dislike the current 1st and 2nd choice strips, so more popular designs would bring more money into the club from more shirts sold.
we provide the club with feedback from our public meetings and i'll add that to the list of questions asked and make sure i raise it with either DH or PH when i next speak to them.
