Logic fail. Best player has nothing to do with the league titles. players can be brilliant because of what they contribute even if the rest of the team is ****e it does not diminish that player, you are talking bollocks and using league wins by which you append the quality of the rest of the squad to the players you think are best. If you can't get your head around what best player means then god bless you Just like the RvP argument, you and Swarbs keep talking about the league title last year and bollocks about league position, it's a complete fail because the stats are in Suarez favour and so this other tripe you lot spout is an attempt that stinks of desperation to try claim RvP is better than Suarez. No one else but you mancs consider RvP better, says it all really.
Several on the list have no league winners medal. They had other influences on the league. Its also easier to stand out in a poorer side than a top side. Perhaps Gerrard had qualities no other player had? Nope. Perhaps he had liverpool punching above their weight? Nope Perhaps he was the best player around? Nope. He was a good players whos gung ho style was better suited to cup matches than the league.
When did I ever mention Gerrard UIR? or any Liverpool player you numpty. You cannot really have a best "player" anyway, a best 11 would be more apt. Even Schmeichel would be in with a shout for best player if people didn't get such hardons for attackers. He's certainly been the best PL keeper to date.
