First you chase Robo off for having a different opinion, now you have tubby tastic banned for having a different opinion. This board is fast becoming into a big clique, and you're only welcome if you agree with the views of the mods. It's impossible to share an opinion different to the consensus anymore without being shot down aggressively and ridiculed by the anti name change gangsters, and the mods offer no protection from the abuse. In fact they actively encourage it and request anyone who sticks up for them self be banned or just bully them until they leave. This is unacceptable, you made promises only the other day and you've already broken them. What I'm getting at is its clear you are using this site for grooming...
I think Robo threw a wobbler and 'banned' himself - no? Fat-tastic only appeared on here to be a 'star', the centre of attention. I don't think he ever contributed anything of worth. But I didn't know he'd been banned. And i don't agree with Dutch on quite a few things. In fact, I hate everybody....
Have another read. I never banned tubby. He was banned under two other names and then asked to be banned again, which PLT duly obliged. As for grooming...you said it was our little secret and bad things would happen if I told.
Tubby was a prat, he never posted anything about football, he just tried to start arguments, the board is a better place without him. Robo is in self-exile, there's no reason why he can't come back.
Seems a bit off for banning someone for being annoying, that's hardly an exclusive club on here is it? When you measure it against posters being unbanned despite their multiple racist, homophobic and generally awful posts, it does make it seem like there's an element of "if you dont agree with us, we'll ban you because we can". How many people need to make a request for someone to be banned for it to happen? or is it a case if one of the special ones request it, it happens?
I wasn't aware that Stuart Blampey, Suited & Booted or Erik had been banned to start with, and you can add sexism to that list as well as religious prejudice. Shame they got unbanned, they're all parasites who do nowt but detract from this site (well maybe Erik can be a laugh at times but the other pair are just vile ****s). Anyway I believe the process is as follows: Big bully mod requests ban for user they don't like/doesn't agree with them. Big supermod bans resistance fighter in the interests of preservation of the clique.
I'm too boring to be banned. Oh, how I imagine making belligerent posts, how I fantasise of being called a WUM or a troll. It's what dreams are made of.....
It has been told that posters messages have possibly been tampered with and then put out under the name of the poster of the original message. I do not know if this is a type of libel-even though we all use code names. Whatever it is or is not it is a pretty ****ty way of treating people and will be regarded with suspicion if the views being altered go against the views of the mods. Unless someone is being a racist/homophobic thug just post what they write please.
Bus, you've been told wrong. If a mod altered or deleted posts for their own personal agenda, the board owners would know and act, as all actions are visible to them.
Did anybody think tubby tastic added anything at all to this forum ? I must admit I didn't and thought he was just here to cause trouble Surely there is a point where the disruption caused isn't fair to people who want some kind of serious discussion
DMD, or PLT, on a less sarcastic issue. Since being unbanned I don't have the option to like/dislike posts, when the forum gets busy I get blocked off from the forum with the message "server load is full, guest viewing is blocked" or whatever it says and 50% of images posted in posts I can't see and get a message saying "guests are unable to view images, please register to view". Can one of you have a word with one of the forum gods to sort it out as they're impossible for us mere mortals to reach.
I think it was a condition of your parole, along with the tagging. I thought we all got the server full, log on message? Is the image thing when some people post the ones linked to the server rather than the external link, in which case we'd all get that if we weren't logged on? I've not noticed you like anything ever, you're a miserable twat, so I can't see that being an issue anyway. Seriously, apart from the like/dislike issue which I'll ask someone to look at, does that seem to answer your other issues?
I get the message and blocked from the forum while I'm logged in. And on the 'in defence of dr. allam' thread, I myself posted an access denied image, as soon as I pressed post it got this message "<font color="red">Guests can not see images in the messages. Please register in the forum by clicking <a href="register.php"><strong>here</strong></a>.</font>" Never saw it until last night and now it seems to be happening on 50% of photos posted on here. I always used to like/dislike things, I don't see how thats a condition of parole, it's ****ing silly, what kind of abuse can I cause with that? Get it sorted Dutch, that's an order!
That picture thing's happening to me too, so I'll do soemthing about that. I'll mention your issues while I'm at it.
Questions asked. It sometimes takes a while to get a response though. Total guess, but often when the site owner is tinkering, things go a bit tits up for a bit.
Nobody gives a **** about how you feel you are persecuted. If you put your opinion out there you should expect there to be people that disagree with it. If you get upset by the simple words of strangers I would suggest that the internet is not the place for you Oh and by the way I am not normally somebody that will attack the posts of people like you, as they are generally put together in a manner with no real reasoning and not worth the effort. All pro-name change people seem to post is "Let Allam do what he wants" and "You are all in a clique that doesn't let us express ourselves". You can put whatever you want onto an open forum, but don't expect people to respect your opinion if all you talk is bullshit. If you put up a post that makes logical sense e.g. "this market research has shown that..." then your side of the debate will be taken on board, but if you repeatedly spout the same antagonistic rubbish you will not see a positive reaction..
