Oh dear Erry you can be a boring ****. You are one of those, why only use 10 words to make a point when I can use 100 and bore the arse off posters.
That's cool Mug. Good for you, claiming you skim my articles so you don't have to answer to any points where you're exposed. You do try to dig me out though, like I said, I've never went for you despite reading endless amounts of contradictory and hypocritical diarrhoea from you, I tend to stay out of it. You go digging at every opportunity, you've probably got more spades than Paul Daniels pal. You're obviously happy to go round telling everyone they're wrong until somebody does the same to you, then you claim you're bored or you don't have time for it. You spend your weekends telling people on an online forum that their opinion is invalid, often juggling multiple arguments on multiple threads at the same time. When was the last time I posted on this site on a weekend, and you do it ALL WEEKEND!! Jesus you call me boring.
That still picture say's it all mate. That still picture tells us that Catts managed cram in a foul, pick himself up off the floor, turn away from the incident and began to walk, all while that **** is still rolling!
It'll be interesting to see if the appeal panel look at that picture or review videos to get a full idea of what occurred.
Regardless of the outcome, it's not going to change their minds. Cattermole is a very well behaved player who didn't get progressively pissed off the more we passed the ball around him and there was absolutely no, and I repeat, no malice or intent in his challenge towards ex team-mate Elmohamady who, prior to the challenge, had mocked the Sunderland fans and pointed to his name whilst blowing a kiss after the O.G. The joys of those who weren't there ayy?
Lets be honest mate. It's you lot who can't stand a difference of opinion. If this thread was on your board then fair enough, but you're over here whining like bitches because some people on their own board dare to start a thread where a lot of peoples opinions don't match your own. So dress it up how you want. You're just being irritating, interfering, know it alls. EG, we play Southampton in two days and we've not had cross words either on here or on their board and tend not to have cross words with 90% of teams. Ask any other board on the forum, you Hull Not 606ers have made quite a name for yourselves. Nobody likes you. we play.
The point in a Multi-Club Forum is that the discussion between opposition fans is encouraged, giving opinions, insights and on the odd occasion assistance with directions, pubs etc. Why sign up to that if you're whole purpose is to remain on your own board? And, I find most of that paragraph massively hypocritical considering you are also arguing on the basis that you disagree with our (and most pundits') opinions. What makes yours so funny is the fact that you weren't even there yet seem to believe your opinion is just. There's even Sunderland fans who have come out and said it was a clear red and, surprise-surprise, they were the ones there. In my honest opinion, all 3 challenges were a red card. Both Cattermole's and Brady's probably would have been justified with yellows but considering the modern game, unfortunately for Sunderland, meant that the blatantly obvious frustration building in Cattermole as City pissed around and played 5 or 10 minutes of first-touch passing added to his notoriety meant he saw red. Get over yourself and let it go, even Dermot Gallagher has come out and said they were justified decisions. I honestly believe Cattermole was getting Elmohamady back for the mockery and lack of respect he showed towards Sunderland, but, as you say; everyone's entitled to their own decisions.
You're welcome over here, but quite a lot of you have been rude and abusive and it's been met with disdain. If brady had went then I wouldn't have issue, the inconsistency has most of us vexed and rightly so in my opinion, I've never at any point defended Lee Cattermole's intentions all I've tried to draw attention to is why Catts' tackle was less severe than Brady's (imo) and how Elmo's reaction was extremely unprofessional. See this is much easier without all the 'southern geordie' and 'hull's a **** hole' jibes, that has inveded and spoiled every single thread related to this match. Most of this has been instigated by your responsible, example setting Mod, you see my point?
Nope. If you check, my posts started politely until one or two nuggets off here tried to argue for arguments sake. The clear fact they didn't have a point meant they were on a loser. I've noticed the main initial culprit is a repeat offender. They even tried using the remembrance thread to throw abuse. I joined the thread discussing the tackle as it's a cross forum set up and offered my considered opinion against some knee jerk comments from people that had seen a photo. It's what the boards are for. It's quite easy for anyone that gives a **** to look back at the posts and see which of us is talking ****e. I'm happy for people to do that and make their own minds up. My guess is you won't want that and you'll post some more childish insults to try to avoid some of your own looking like idiots.
My problem with you formed long before kick off when you tried to give us a lecture on where we live, I would bet that's where a lot of the animosity stems from. Not to mention the whole demoralisation debate where you took offence to some of us applying some harmless logic and opinion. We remained happy with our own opinion but you would not accept it and pushed and pushed and pushed. When you can't sway someones opinion you become relentless more determined when most people would just agree to disagree and move on. You've got issues in my opinion.
You seem unable to see the world outside your deluded bubble. What you mention aren't issues, they're topics of debate on a discussion forum. Subjects I have an informed opinion on and which some on here agreed with. The issues are all yours.
I suspected when you arrived here looking for exactly this kind of argument and your continued presence, on here, would appear to confirm it. I made a comment about a 'demoralising defeat' at which point you became insulting, the first person to behave that way on these threads concerning Hull. You kept this up, with comments about Sunderland posters being 'special needs' or whatever until you were warned by one of the Sunderland mods. You seem to have taken a totally manic and unreasonable offence at a fairly harmless comment and strung it out for days. Is a defeat demoralising, some say yes and some no. It's not that big a deal either way and certainly not the huge insult to Hull that you perceive. I'd say our defeat at Hull was demoralising and I'd suspect many, on here, would agree. Whether or not you're correct it's poor behaviour from a mod and a hysterical tirade by any standards. You immediately claimed I was ignorant and refused to explain until asked half a dozen times. No doubt you'll go on and on and on with you relentless arrogance and aggressive posting but they just reinforce the idea that you have a massive chip on your shoulder. This board seems to be a massive part of your life whereas most of us come on here for a bit of fun and arguments that don't involve the kind of pathetic insults you seem to love. As has been said we have many other supporters on here, such as the Southampton lad, who's been met with debate and courtesy. Your 'style' of posting seems to be to look for an argument wherever you can find one and then just relentlessly plough on without any consideration that you might be taking this all too seriously. No doubt, when we've all become totally bored and given up responding as I will now do, you'll declare a glorious victory and go on to your next quest. The board, and your 'courageous' defence of all things Hull seems to be your reason to live, it's supposed to be a bit of fun. However, despite your endless pontificating all you've accomplished is to be given a warning by a mod, see one of your fellow posters banned and changed no one's mind on any subject. No doubt, in your mind, you've come on here and 'shown us all'. What you have shown us is that some people can convince themselves of anything.
The thread's still there. You posted ill-informed pap, my reply was "I hope your manage thinks the same" Instead of admitting you'd been silly, or trying to discuss it YOU became abusive and needlessly argumentative, as I've since found you have a habit of. As I explained to your mod, I never accused anyone of having special needs,as your posts pointed that way, I asked if you had so I could respond accordingly. As yet, nobody has said you haven't so I've tried to be more appropriate with my replies. I really don't think you've got the right idea of what a cross board discussion forum's all about.
