Have you ever, in your life, heard players talking to people in the street, or in media interviews admitting they were demoralised? They can't because they know what people want to hear. You choose to take it as gospel which, as a gullible mug, is your choice.
You're really struggling here aren't you? Why not have a break and give your brain a chance to catch up with your mouth
Yep, I've heard that very thing from players and from people within the club in the past. Those stories then find their way into the press. There are other stories subject to legal restraints that never make the press, but that are common knowledge locally and tend to be verified from several different versions. It's not just a simple case of saying "Is everyone happy" it's based on the whole gamut, such as body language, attitude etc. As you can see from this exchange, I do question things I don't agree with. You seem to make the mistake of assuming that everyone's as limited as you.
Ah, you post with a mouth stick. The picture's becoming clearer. Full credit for your efforts, your quite adept at getting the letters down, but the content tends to be wanting.
It's my opinion that defeats are discouraging whereas victories are encouraging. Many people who have played any kind of sport, at any level, would agree. Unless, as is my opinion, they're gullible fools who believe that it has no effect whatsoever. I'll repeat, because you're thick .......... It's an opinion, no one can be right or wrong.
...and the needle returns to the start of the track... As I said earlier, you can have your own opinion, but you can't have your own facts. Your opinion is based on very shallow generalisations, mine is based on deeper knowledge of this particular set of circumstances. The clear facts in this case are that the players are far from demoralised, that makes you wrong. In fact, there's more evidence to support my specific claim that you're a ****wit, than there is to support the claim you, for some peculiar reason, are still trying to wriggle out of.
Silly childish liar. No wonder you spend so much time repeating "internet" retorts you have read elsewhere. You are clearly thick as pig **** and haven't got an original thought in your empty head. But ****ing hell, you may be thick, but you're a trier I'll give you that.
Yes, talking to other slack jawed dopes in the pub You've no idea whatsoever of the state of mind of the players ........... neither have I. Dear God, you're thick as pigshit and the most boring poster I've seen on these boards. I won't reply to you again, your type always believe you're right despite always accusing other people of the same thing. You wouldn't change your opinion if I produced a sworn statement from one of the players. You don't merit any more of my time, if the Hull Education Authority failed so miserably then what chance would I have
I haven't linked any internet reports have I, that was your noddy friend. I'm also the one that's tried (despite much wriggling from smugsy and you) to stick to the subject at hand, so no lies either. I wouldn't mind, but like you two, it's pretty much irrelevant anyway.
Yep, you're a deluded **** wit and you base everything on your own poor standards and then make half arsed assumptions based on it. Get some dark glasses on smugsy, reality seems to blind you. As for not replying, I reckon you will. You'll even keep making weak and feeble digs on other threads. You're a type. There's quite a few similar fragile, delicate ****wits hiding on message boards.
What reports you thick ****? The only thing irrelevant here is your good self. The word I used was RETORTS you ****ing halfwit. You know all those cliché RETORTS you keep on spouting when you are losing an argument. The ones you HAVE to use all the time as you are an utter bellend, with absolutely zero originality. Your patter is so weak it would even shame a skunk. I hope this clears it up for you. I doubt it will though, as you are clearly an ignorant snot nosed child, who thinks he is a great keyboard warrior. I thought this from your first posts and the rest of your posts have confirmed it, so well done on that. At least you can claim consistency.
Mr/Ms. Hull City AFC, can I interrupt your flow for a second to point out that you have accused posters of having Special Needs several times. Either they have and you are arguing with people who you regard as beneath your high intellect ( you bully) or you are using the term as an insult. If only there were rules to protect less fortunate members of society. Wait a minute.....there are! Do you know a good Mod?
I'm pleased you noticed and seem to agree that they do seem 'different'. I was trying to find out if they did in deed have special needs so I could reply accordingly rather than be a bully.
Oi! I have now had several of your posts reported into my email inbox, i must say that is quite a feat from this thick skinned lot, so i suggest you take your special needs crack elsewhere ok
Thick skinned? THICK skinned?? This is all because smugsy got upset at being wrong so through his teddy and some childish insults about. Look, I actually think I've been polite and patient, given the attempts to twist, wriggle and abuse away from the topic. but fair enough, if you're asking me not to bring the glare of reality into what seems to be the dark delusion they're happy in, I'll bimble off to pub and football. Safe journey to any travelling.
