Now before I start this article, this is in no way shape or form a Everton 'diss' thread or thinking we are better than them or anything like that. I respect Everton a huge deal as I like the manager and like the way the club is run, it's a proper club.
Anyway, whilst all the drama of SAFC unfolded today (atleast we can never be called boring) Henderson out, and three Manchester United players in (Hopefully!), it got me thinking.
Look at Everton from the outside, a club that is quite similar to ours. However, they don't have a few things that we do, for example the size of our stadium, fanbase, money available from the board for transfers etc etc. But we do have a few things similar, a good academy that brings through young promising talent etc.
What gets me puzzled is how to Everton hold on to players? Rodwell is a very promising player, and has played a lot more in the PL than Henderson yet with all the speculation he hasnt moved an inch. Yet the slightest interest in JH and thats it, we haggle the club and get the fee we want and thats it the player goes. Everton have a host of talent, Jagielka, Baines, Rodwell, Arteta, Cahil and many young ones coming through like Coleman etc... Nobody can tell me that big clubs haven't shown an interest in these players... So what is it? Loyalty? Money? Considering that Everton don't have tons and tons of money I doubt it is that.
I believe it is the manager. What he says goes and it is simple as that. The only player that left that I can think of being an integral part of Everton when he left was Lescott and look at how good a deal they got for him. Moyes is a credit to football, his work ethic and the way he runs the club from top to bottom...
Bruce on the other hand is different. Coming from clubs like Wigan and B'ham I believe that he hasn't got out off the philosophy that he doesnt have to sell players. When someone shows interest he thinks that he can't say no.
Now I am going off the thread a little bit but I wanted to know what you guys thought honestly... Everton aren't a London club, so geography wise it isn't really that. What is it that Everton have that they can build quality players, get further in competitions, compete well in the PL and also hold on to players when there is a slight interest in any of there talent??
How can they do the things that we can't, when money wise and stadium wise we are better and possibly more of an attractive opposition???
Anyway, whilst all the drama of SAFC unfolded today (atleast we can never be called boring) Henderson out, and three Manchester United players in (Hopefully!), it got me thinking.
Look at Everton from the outside, a club that is quite similar to ours. However, they don't have a few things that we do, for example the size of our stadium, fanbase, money available from the board for transfers etc etc. But we do have a few things similar, a good academy that brings through young promising talent etc.
What gets me puzzled is how to Everton hold on to players? Rodwell is a very promising player, and has played a lot more in the PL than Henderson yet with all the speculation he hasnt moved an inch. Yet the slightest interest in JH and thats it, we haggle the club and get the fee we want and thats it the player goes. Everton have a host of talent, Jagielka, Baines, Rodwell, Arteta, Cahil and many young ones coming through like Coleman etc... Nobody can tell me that big clubs haven't shown an interest in these players... So what is it? Loyalty? Money? Considering that Everton don't have tons and tons of money I doubt it is that.
I believe it is the manager. What he says goes and it is simple as that. The only player that left that I can think of being an integral part of Everton when he left was Lescott and look at how good a deal they got for him. Moyes is a credit to football, his work ethic and the way he runs the club from top to bottom...
Bruce on the other hand is different. Coming from clubs like Wigan and B'ham I believe that he hasn't got out off the philosophy that he doesnt have to sell players. When someone shows interest he thinks that he can't say no.
Now I am going off the thread a little bit but I wanted to know what you guys thought honestly... Everton aren't a London club, so geography wise it isn't really that. What is it that Everton have that they can build quality players, get further in competitions, compete well in the PL and also hold on to players when there is a slight interest in any of there talent??
How can they do the things that we can't, when money wise and stadium wise we are better and possibly more of an attractive opposition???