There are masses of evidence over the last 20 or 30 years which shows there was collusion between the UDR/UVF/RUC et al, not just this report which is merely the latest in a litany of such cases. Every man and his ****ing dog knows there was collusion, it is beyond doubt there was collusion but you are casting doubt because of the source.
Northern Ireland's police "colluded with loyalists to cover up Catholic murders" Did they chip in for a nice sheet ?
There has also been eveidence of collusion between Republican groups and Irish Government and even betweeen the IRA and the UVF . Jist goes to show ..... ye can never trust a paddy
Awe Dev think of the hours of arguing we could do if it wasn't just the hun boards we were doing it on .....what fun !
Bigot! Who would I believe 1st. A woman working for the media machine in the Pat Finucane centre or a Senior Special Branch officer. Like he said. Show the evidence. If it is debunked then i will be moving all the books to the fiction section in Waterstones.
He has a point though . It's not as if the author is likely to be neutral is it ? Anyhoo thought all this tit for tat pish was suppose to be ended . Isn't that why they empted the Maze ?
Comment..............Debate.................Freely "But not if I don't like It" Exactly how Nazi Germany started.
If the RUC and UDR themselves held a massive press conference and announced to the world that they colluded with Bigoted murdering bastards you would still blame someone else. You are a waste of skin.
Aye ye hiv that . Explain why you didn't really make a **** of it even though you know fine well ye did
Why is that? Who in your opinion in Ireland is "Neutral"? Whose word can be accepted as fact? http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/dec/12/david-cameron-pat-finucane-murder David Cameron admits 'shocking levels of collusion' in Pat Finucane murder
I agree but on the other hand a Special branch officer is unlikely to say "actually yes - we helped the UDA and UVF kill a load of innocent catholics".
An "argument" would infer that both parties were involved, I don't recall even talking to you until you took Medro's side. So if there was an argument as you say, then it was you who wanted it.
