No name calling ... Sure being called Mrs would have the delicate soul rocking back and forth waiting for diazepam.. Never say anything controversial ... It follows you around. You Squire labelled City fans total and utter bores and said you had no respect for them.
Just because I don't like, and have never really like our manager or his strategies, for some reason Sixtyseconds took it upon himself to try and suggest that I would be hateful towards one of the clubs only positives, which is unfair and ridiculous coming from a man who knows nothing about me. The support has always been good for O'Driscoll at games, and at games I keep my opinions to myself as I don't think its helpful to put the team down. However like some on here, I like to vent my frustrations, and "some of us" on here have said for a long long time that O'Driscoll is not the man for the job and questioned his tactics. What you don't get about that, I don't know. What you, sixtyseconds and cliftonville don't like is that we were right, and even yourself are questioning whet SoD should remain. So instead of talking facts sixtyseconds has made up nonsense about me. Which is childish and pathetic, all in order to try and evade answering questions about and facts put towards him!
That's a wind up? There was a thread on here started by a mod having a dig at Ziderheads. It was later deleted. If not a wind up that comment is uneven.
Ibodys.. Sean O'driscoll made a remark about an element of support not support as one entity. You have taken it out of context. You have also taken another posters remark out of context. It was a mild quip. You clearly do not like and rate Sean O'driscoll at all so won't like some Eastenders action to back him. Easy assumption that. It was not ridiculous. You are not right. You use hyperbole. The team isn't the shambles you claim it is. The team beneath McInnes was a shambles that gave up in games. In the last three league games City have been in, they managed to be good in one and still not win. I find the team a curiosity. The thread was about support, you derailed it and made it about the Head coach.
I followed the thread how it evolved. If I took anything out of context I apologise, as I am man enough to do that. But you say I am not right, but what is right. My opinion is my opinion and is just as valid and "right" as your is. The difference is, some of us don't take to kindly to be attacked for our opinion and labelled a certain type of fan! I support the club, and have supported managers until the bitter end. Just because I don't support SoD, does not make me a negative fan or a bad supporter. I don't know what else you would describe the team as other than a shambles. They have the worst record in the football league as it stands, and this team and management have the worst record in over 80 years of football. What would you call it? If you say transition I will scream, and sign post you to Coventry, a club in bigger turmoil than us and in "transition", but ripping the league apart at the moment!
The last three league games highlight the team is not in disorder, if it was the opposition would be hitting fours and fives. Anybody who has watched the games will have seen a team that is not in disarray. lacking confidence yes, chaotic no. The performance at Vale was good not only according to those who attended, but also the oppositions fans. I have seen worse footballing teams, teams like Osmans that lead to a mass fan walk out at Pompey win. Taking somebody else line I would describe BCFC as curious, capable of dominating possession but lacking potency. A shambles that is not.
I am sorry, anyone can play possession football, but you have to use that possession to execute the fundamentals of playing the game in the first place, which is winning games. The team we played only 3 days prior to last nights game, lost 3 goals in 10 minutes! To a team only a few places above us in a league, a team who you would question how on earth they are in this league with all due respect to them. If we can't even come close to that, by even putting 3 shots on target, let alone scoring 3, then what does dominating possession achieve. Nothing. Our players, without a shadow of a doubt, are better than Stevenage's players. So in my view that makes the game plan a shambles, and it hasn't worked for us at all in the time SoD has been trying to implement it. If it doesn't work in the beginning of your tenure, it damn sure won't work when the rest of the league has worked out your strategy. The longer your players are asked to play a way that doesn't work, which its proven it doesn't, I think we can surely agree on that, the worse their confidence becomes, the more strained the relationship between the players and the manager becomes. Ergo shambles.
