From the Mail """" Hughes: I was tainted by QPR so I know I'm lucky to get another chance at the Britannia By JOE BERNSTEIN Mark Hughes is in something of a confessional mood as he reflects on his madhouse days at Manchester City and QPR compared with the relative sanity of Stoke City. âI donât cultivate or enhance relationships by just talking on the phone,â he says. âIâd rather sit and have a conversation person-to-person. Thatâs the way you should be able to speak to people. And thatâs obviously when I think I am at my best.â The message is clear. After struggling to cope with absentee owners at Manchester City and chairmen with international business commitments at Fulham (Mohamed Al Fayed) and QPR (Tony Fernandes), Hughes is happier in his new surroundings. Stoke owner Peter Coates is a genuine lifelong fan and still lives and works locally. New style: Mark Hughes has been tasked with introducing a new style at the Britannia New style: Mark Hughes has been tasked with introducing a new style at the Britannia Flair: The likes of Marko Arnautovic have been brought into the side to add some much-needed creativity Flair: The likes of Marko Arnautovic have been brought into the squad to add some much-needed creativity NEW BRIEF Mark Hughes was given a clear brief when he arrived at Stoke: change the playing style! Just a month into the season it looks as though heâs pulled it off. These are the statistics which prove Stoke under Hughes are becoming far more pleasing on the eye than they were under Tony Pulis. 79 - Percentage of passes completed, more than in any of the five seasons under Tony Pulis. 397 - Average passes per game, also more than at any time in Pulisâs reign. 65 - Percentage of passes completed in final third, 13 per cent more than last season. The job is a shot at redemption for Hughes, who turns 50 in November. A bright start to his managerial career with Wales, Blackburn and Fulham was overshadowed by the sack at City and then at QPR just 12 games into last season. âIâm grateful for the opportunity,â admits Hughes, whose side play Arsenal. âMy stock was low because of QPR. I did actually keep them up the previous season, but that seemed to have been airbrushed out. I seemed to get blamed for everything that went wrong at QPR last season, even the games they lost after Iâd left! âWhen I spoke to the Coates family and [chief executive] Tony Scholes, they wanted to understand what went on at Rangers, and rightly so. But they had also done their homework, speaking to people who had worked with me before. Redemption: The Stoke job is a second chance for Hughes after his struggles at QPR Redemption: The Stoke job is a second chance for Hughes after his struggles at QPR âThankfully, they must have heard good things because I got the job. If theyâd been swayed by public opinion, it would have been difficult for me. âA Premier League managerâs relationship with his owners and executives has to be strong. To have an absent owner youâd never see â and a chairman whoâd fly in occasionally [at Man City] â meant I would have to cultivate a relationship on the phone. It was never going to really happen to the right level. âMaybe I didnât give enough daily information which allowed them to be comfortable with me. âMy managing upwards at City wasnât great. I should have recognised earlier than I did that there was this prerequisite to phone [Khaldoon Al Mubarak] every day. But I was always of the view that if thereâs nothing wrong, why should I phone?â When he arrived at Loftus Road, Hughes was horrified by the lack of spirit. Fernandes backed him with money, but it happened too quickly. Despite signing 25 players in two seasons, QPR were relegated last summer after Hughes was axed following the first dozen winless games. 'The perception is that I brought in a lot of players at one time that disrupted the dressing room, and that was the reason they had a bad season. But the dressing room was damaged when I got there,â says Hughes. âWeâd got through the first season and stayed up, but I knew that group couldnât keep us in the Premier League. I tried to add qualities I thought were lacking, brought in good characters. But, in the end, if the mix is tainted you canât do anything.â Huge turnover: Hughes brought in a large number of new players to QPR but many of the signings didn't work out Huge turnover: Hughes brought in a large number of new players to QPR but many of the signings didn't work out Joey Barton was allowed to head to Marseille on loan after going berserk and kicking players on the final day of the season at Manchester City. âI think there was a conscious decision, after that, that it was going to be difficult for Joey to stay at the club while I was the manager,â said Hughes. âIt was a decision made not just by me. We all agreed, rightly or wrongly. Iâve always made decisions I feel benefit a club long term. Given my recent experiences, people will probably say thatâs laughable, but Iâve always done that.â So far, Hughes has won over any sceptics at Stoke. Defeat at Liverpool on the opening day was followed by wins against Crystal Palace and West Ham. They dominated a 0-0 draw against Manchester City last weekend without a long throw in sight. âI realised they are capable of playing more football than possibly theyâve been allowed to in the past,â explains Hughes. âI think thatâs showing up in the way we play. I may have come here guilty of underestimating the talent. Having worked with them, I know thereâs more to come.â High maintenance: Hughes has a good record with players who come with baggage High maintenance: Hughes has a good record with players who come with baggage Relationship: Hughes has got the best out of the likes of Craig Bellamy and Robbie Savage Relationship: Hughes has got the best out of the likes of Craig Bellamy and Robbie Savage After getting the best out of Craig Bellamy and Robbie Savage at other clubs, Hughes has embraced the chance to work with other supposedly high-maintenance characters at Stoke. Jermaine Pennant, who served a prison term for drink-driving, was given a new contract after being frozen out by Tony Pulis. New signings include Austrian forward Marko Arnautovic, said by Jose Mourinho to have the mentality of a baby; Dutch defender Erik Pieters, who sliced his arm punching a window, and Stephen Ireland, who invented the deaths of two grandmothers to get out of playing for the Republic of Ireland. âEarlier in his career, Craig Bellamy could be a pain for everybody,â recalls Hughes. âBut I knew he was a passionate football guy. He wanted to work to try to become one of the best players in Europe. If he was given sessions that had no thought or purpose to them, youâd get a reaction. A lot of players are like that, they just want to work and improve.â Next stop: Hughes faces Arsenal and Mesut Ozil who will play his first match at the Emirates Next stop: Hughes faces Arsenal and Mesut Ozil who will play his first match at the Emirates The next challenge is Arsene Wenger, with whom Hughes crossed swords after a 2005 FA Cup semi-final when Blackburn were criticised for trying to kick Arsenal off the park. âWe werenât good enough on the day and did things to try to get back in the game. But it wasnât the game-plan or at my instigation,â insists Hughes. âThere was a challenge by Andy Todd on Robin van Persie â he elbowed him â but it wasnât intentional and he wasnât given any sanction.â Hughes graced Manchester United, Barcelona Bayern Munich and Chelsea as a player. His career in management has not followed the smooth trajectory of Wenger, but he said: âIâm in a small group to have worked at top level as player and manager. I might not look it, but I still feel a young man.â @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook """"""
I just read that. I have many opinions to share about it but ill just share this one. He didn't keep us up in our first season. Audacious performances from some of our players kept us up.
âMy stock was low because of QPR. I did actually keep them up the previous season, but that seemed to have been airbrushed out. I seemed to get blamed for everything that went wrong at QPR last season, even the games they lost after Iâd left! You was manager, you brought in the players you wanted, they didn't perform - you're damn right you deserve the blame for last season you twat!
If he thought they were a team that wouldn't stay up the next season why did he say when never be in a relegation scrap again?
Dear oh dear!! Sometimes things are best left unsaid - seems his demons are eating at him as he tries to wriggle out of his responsibilities (for the mess he made). Must say though, making it sound like his latest chairman is 'so good' sounds like a bit of a slap in the face to Tony considering how much he backed him in HIS choice of players and continued support to clear up his mess!!
You rarely hear managers of successful teams saying that this success is a complete fluke and they're fortunate to have created a functioning squad purely by chance. So, on that basis, it is only fair that they take the lion's share of the blame when it goes wrong. If you threw thousands (nay millions) at a builder whose magnificent erection (snigger) collapsed in no time at all, would you accept the explanation that this was not his fault, but that the materials used were sub-standard? At least in the building trade you could both sue the bastard and bring criminal charges; in the mad, mad footie bubble you pay up his contract, thank him for his wonderful contribution and wish him well for the future.
of course we are blame him for the matches we lost after he was sackd, his baggage didnt leave and he'd already got rid of the rest (barton, HH, etc)
He had an open chequebook which he opted to spend on a load of 30 year-old names in the hope we'd have one good season and he'd get the move to a bigger club off the back of it. He had about as much to do with QPR staying up as I did. Quite amazing how he tries to distance himself from the mess he created.
I used to bag Hughes for all and sundry but he's long gone now, we are riding high with Harry and all is good.
Obviously the logical way to introduce team spirit is to buy in 25 new players whilst alienating anyone already at the club. What a complete moron
Jog on Mark Hughes. Mediocre team with a mediocre manager in one of the U-bends of the UK. All well suited to each other.
On the Managerial side Colin played a bigger part in keeping us up the first season than Hughes. Still stay up we did, and he brought in one player Cisse who'se goals saved us along with some luck with our relegation rivals. I never wanted Hughes to replace Colin, but after that first season I thought, as I think most on here did, that he probably deserved longer. For me that changed with his terrible buying that summer, and I wanted him out early last season. We got relegated because of Hughes buying, and his inabilty to make a team of us, and because TF took too long to sack him.
The Stoke team is largely the same players last season, Hughes has not brought many in and they are doing reasonably well. It is no coincidence that the two teams at the bottom of the premiership are Palace and Sunderland, both who brought in many new players over the summer. Yes Hughes is 100% to blame for the shambles last season as it is shown again that you cannot bring in a totally new team and expect to perform straightaway.