1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Carragher: Why Lampard is better than Scholes..

Discussion in 'Chelsea' started by CFC: Champs £launderx17, Sep 14, 2013.

  1. CFC: Champs £launderx17

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    19,665
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    he peaked and faded early. Lamps best ever season 09/10 when he was in 30s
     
    #21
  2. chelsea - over 100 years of history

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2011
    Messages:
    9,306
    Likes Received:
    939
    I think one of the things that makes Frank so great is how he has achieved so much with relatively little natural ability compared to others. Scholes has more natural talent but Frank is probably the biggest example in the modern era of a player working his arse into the ground to achieve great things. That should be celebrated in an era where the likes of Raheem Sterling demands 60k a week becuase he's played a couple of good games or Sturridge that demanded 50k a week from City for having a good run in the fa youth cup!!

    Franks goals record and consistency with (lack of) injuries, performances, goals and assists is amazing and he has done it at a very high level for 12-13 years now. Frank is a great leader on the pitch, great ambasador off it and when he finally leaves/retires, will be the biggest loss to our club ever IMO.
     
    #22
  3. Manobear

    Manobear I love cheeseburgers

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    Messages:
    3,164
    Likes Received:
    44
    Can't disagree with this. <ok>

    If it were a 442, I'd rather have Scholes. If it were a 3 man midfield I'd have both, with Lampard in the attacking midfield role.
     
    #23

Share This Page