I was wondering, should we change the name of the Besian idrizaj prediction league too ? after all KJ he is also "yesterdays news "
Clearly you have difficulty with the concept of "no offence". As for "sorry for saying but this is extremely relevant to our team." "extremely relevant"? Er... no it's not. Otherwise we'd have threads on every single team in 'our league'. I do agree with you about not commenting on threads that are uninteresting or irrelevant though. Now when's your thread on UFO's coming up. I'm looking forward to that one.
Im thankfull to all the players that helped us on the way up from the bottom to the top of the leagues for the time they had here. I may be looking through rose tinteds but to me Trundle was the best of them all !
But Trundle is still around and is employed by the Club. Can't work out NJ's obsession with DG which is a tad worrying though. We had one when DG was getting stick from Mackems too. He's gone. He's irrelevant. If others disagree, then I respect that. As for your comment on Idrizaj - that was pretty low, NJ and I'd like to think you regret that. Anyway, I'm taking your advice and won't comment again on this one
when he had his magic daps on playing for us ! sorry if i wasnt specific enough for you. Was he with us when we reached the prem ?
You said past players yesterdays news, but its clear that they arnt . They are always relevant if they have pulled on the shirt for us , least that's how most Swans tend to feel about past players . DG is relelvent to us because he may score the goals that could make life difficult for Swansea, that was the case when he was at Sunderland too,hence the thread about his form there !! Im not offended by what you say im just defending my right to talk about what I feel is a relevant topic on a message board, Sinclair will also be relevant and so will Ki-sung and siggy to a lesser extent . The thread on the twin towers is going so well, I might have to delay the UFO one for another week or so, you did say can of worms didn't you ? ..
9/11 threads going great nj having lot of fun with it thanks, reactions are intresting from the peeps on it from no way to yes way to open minded way ! DG is minted so not done to bad out of the ugly game.
He's only expressing an opinion, Norway, not creating a new law. I quite like to see how old players are doing: Pratley, Sinclair, Graham, de Vries are all of interest to me, although I guess there is a period of time after which the interest wears off
Now there are many who believe they have evidence that Arnold was in fact Elvis who after major reconstructive surgery lost his marbles a bit, hence his catchphrase "What you talking about?". His own memories of being The King were unfortunately a feint memory due to the massive pain relief taken.....any coincidence Willis and Elvis have the same number of syllables and sound similar when spoken underwater? FACT
Now for a true fact of the day.... The guy who wrote the Different Strokes theme music is the dad of Robin "Blurred Lines" Thicke.
It seems to me that DG took the wrong fork in the road at some stage. Norway is right in that he did a good job for us in the 1st season but his form and fitness dropped off - seemingly permanently. He did well for us but it looks like ML made the right call, especially for £5m! At the end of the day we are better with striking options like Bony and Michu rather than DG so it's a win for us!
Without Danny Graham's goals we would have been relegated during our first season during the premiership, so he should still be considered relevant. Regardless of what happened off the pitch, he always gave 100% when he put on the jersey so I will always be grateful of him for that
"Without Danny Graham's goals we would have been relegated during our first season during the premiership, so he should still be considered relevant" Why should he still be considered relevant?
