I'm not talking about all of them, just a selection of them. The individual players signs were pretty classy- disappointed with the odd exclusion, but that's beside the point. Some of the banners make us look small time. There's one celebrating Ross McCormack scoring against Watford's 3rd choice keeper, at the back end of last season, and the Hull City AFC are the only team whose name you can't colour in. Why the **** do we need those two on a banner? Hull FC have banners celebrating them winning trophies and being successful, and we have dross like that.
That's not the point, is it? I'm saying they have banners marking their successful periods in their history, whereas we have something a kid finds pathetic. Why do we have to make do with that to compensate? We're trying to big up the club, not make it look small time/ a laughing stock. Don't get me started on the Tigers/Tigresses signs.