1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

East Stand concourse banners- is it just me who thinks they're cringeworthy?

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by Hank Scorpio, Sep 15, 2013.

  1. Hank Scorpio

    Hank Scorpio Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    9,449
    Likes Received:
    565
    I'm not talking about all of them, just a selection of them. The individual players signs were pretty classy- disappointed with the odd exclusion, but that's beside the point.

    Some of the banners make us look small time. There's one celebrating Ross McCormack scoring against Watford's 3rd choice keeper, at the back end of last season, and the Hull City AFC are the only team whose name you can't colour in.

    Why the **** do we need those two on a banner?

    Hull FC have banners celebrating them winning trophies and being successful, and we have dross like that.
     
    #1
  2. lewisc29

    lewisc29 Idiot

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Messages:
    7,073
    Likes Received:
    1,562
    There wasn't much of a change in the west stand, I was quite disappointed.
     
    #2
  3. ....

    .... Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,336
    Likes Received:
    334
    because we haven't won a major trophy ?? ... just a thought maybe
     
    #3
  4. Hank Scorpio

    Hank Scorpio Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    9,449
    Likes Received:
    565
    That's not the point, is it?

    I'm saying they have banners marking their successful periods in their history, whereas we have something a kid finds pathetic.

    Why do we have to make do with that to compensate? We're trying to big up the club, not make it look small time/ a laughing stock.

    Don't get me started on the Tigers/Tigresses signs.
     
    #4

Share This Page