1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Micheal Le Vell

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by Dorty Dogbreath, Feb 15, 2013.

  1. Erik

    Erik Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    25,003
    Likes Received:
    3,062
    please log in to view this image
     
    #161
  2. gas

    gas ACCOUNT DELETED
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    19,124
    Likes Received:
    6,716
    <laugh>.

    fuxake
     
    #162
  3. DevAdvocate

    DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    63,752
    Likes Received:
    13,027
    I'm afraid you will have to do better than that ST, there are far more speculative assertions than mine all over this forum, many people already had him down as guilty whereas I did not.

    "Like you i'm not sure if he's guilty or not"

     
    #163
  4. RAVENBLACK

    RAVENBLACK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    24,877
    Likes Received:
    265
    **** me, I'm getting flashbacks. I knew something happened when I was a wee boy, probably.

    Which paper pays the most for revelations?
     
    #164
  5. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    More bullshit <laugh>

    You've gone from speculating on the case to the extent of suggesting he watches child porn to trying the "I wasn't there so can't comment" line in the space of a couple of days.
     
    #165
  6. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    You were too ugly to get abused.
     
    #166
  7. RAVENBLACK

    RAVENBLACK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    24,877
    Likes Received:
    265
    Inspector Dev is floundering.

    Poor old fuddy duddy.
     
    #167
  8. RAVENBLACK

    RAVENBLACK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    24,877
    Likes Received:
    265
    Who said anything about me being abused?
     
    #168
  9. EDGE.

    EDGE. Official POTY 2011, 2014, 2015, 2018 & 2023

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2011
    Messages:
    35,260
    Likes Received:
    46,684
    Taig on Taig stylin' <laugh>

    I wonder if the taig PMer will be PMing me asking me to rein in ST <rofl>
     
    #169
  10. DevAdvocate

    DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    63,752
    Likes Received:
    13,027
    I speculated that Child Porn would be found on his PC, I never said he was Guilty. I said this because if Child Porn had been on his PC that may have gone some way to explaining why the CPS decided to go ahead.




    The Crown Prosecution Service has defended its decision to bring criminalcharges against Michael Le Vell.

    In the wake of the not guilty verdicts, the CPS said the available evidence was subjected to 'careful scrutiny' before a recommendation to charge the actor was made. There was a 'realistic prospect of conviction', said a spokesman, and it was 'in the public interest' to bring the case because of the serious allegations. The CPS however said it respected the verdicts handed down by the jury.
    In a statement, prosecutors said: &#8220;This case was reviewed in great detail,and the evidence subject to careful scrutiny before a decision was taken to prosecute. On the basis of the reviews the CPS concluded that there was sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction.
    As these were very serious allegations of child sexual abuse it therefore followed that it was in the public interest to place that evidence before a jury at court. &#8220;Whilst the CPS needs to consider if a conviction is realistic, the jury needs to be sure that the defendant is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. &#8220;The jury has had an opportunity over the course of the trial to hear and fully consider both the prosecution and the defence cases. It is for the jury to determine whether a defendant is guilty or not and we of course respect the verdicts the jury reached.&#8221;
     
    #170

  11. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    Well, of course they're going to say that. They ****ed up and are now trying to cover their own backs.

    Everyone else on here is of the opinion that they only went to court because of the furore over Savile. Clearly there wasn't 'sufficient evidence' as was ably demonstrated in court.

    I hate to agree with the Daily Mail but why was it ever brought to court? It was the CPS reacting to public outcry over Savile and others and nothing to do with legal diligence.
     
    #171
  12. VenomPD

    VenomPD Merrick jr

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    23,951
    Likes Received:
    4,408

    ^^^

    Boring spastic.
     
    #172
  13. Erik

    Erik Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    25,003
    Likes Received:
    3,062
    I'm watching a video on YouTube called 'Make a Hard Plastic Sheath for Your Knife or Machete'

    Somebody help me
     
    #173
  14. DevAdvocate

    DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    63,752
    Likes Received:
    13,027
    Well as I have said several times I don't know what the CPS' reasons were, maybe, just maybe they believed the complainant.

    "As these were very serious allegations of child sexual abuse it therefore followed that it was in the public interest to place that evidence before a jury at court".

    I agree with this, do you?
     
    #174
  15. RAVENBLACK

    RAVENBLACK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    24,877
    Likes Received:
    265
    You are beyond help.
     
    #175
  16. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    No. I, like most other sane minded people, believe that the CPS got caught up in the Savile frenzy and went ahead with a trial that they had very little chance of winning at great expense.

    If you can't see this then you're beyond help.
     
    #176
  17. alanpartridge

    alanpartridge Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2011
    Messages:
    418
    Likes Received:
    78
    Totally agree with you ST.

    Dev has said that if child porn was found on Le Vells computer that would influence the CPS in deciding to prosecute and he also said that if child porn was found on Le Vells computer it wouldn't be revealed in court.

    In his summing up Le Vells Lawyer Alisdair Williamson said that there was no child porn found on Le Vells computer.
     
    #177
  18. DevAdvocate

    DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    63,752
    Likes Received:
    13,027
    A &#8220;child&#8221; claims to have been sexually abused by a famous person and sticks to her story for several years. Not only does she manage to convince numerous police officers (no doubt highly experienced in the field of child abuse) but numerous legal professionals too.

    According to you - and most other sane minded people - the Law (Police and prosecutors) are only interested in the case because of the whole Saville inquiry, and the only reason they take it to trial is because the feel some sort of pressure to do so.

    I cannot help but wonder if you would feel the same if it were your own child who was the complainant. Should every case - where it is one person&#8217;s word against another - be similarly ignored and not put in front of a jury, just in case Saville is a factor?
     
    #178
  19. DevAdvocate

    DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    63,752
    Likes Received:
    13,027
    If you are too stupid to understand the point I made, please don't comment <ok>
     
    #179
  20. EDGE.

    EDGE. Official POTY 2011, 2014, 2015, 2018 & 2023

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2011
    Messages:
    35,260
    Likes Received:
    46,684
    Classic Provan.

    When all else fails, accuse someone of being too stupid <rofl>
     
    #180

Share This Page