Who the **** scores boxing when watching it for entertainment... a lot of folk feel that boxing is corrupt. Also, a lot of people have given the same opinion that burns was beaten...without their scoring cards.
Jim Watt saw the fight and scored it . He had the Mexican by at least two points . So did Alex Arthur so did just about everybody else who seen it . What did you score it ?
He's talking ****e as usual . It is virtually impossible to score a boxing match from telly pictures accurately .He should know that him being such an authority . I have watched , attended and been involved in enough boxing matches to know how corrupt it is . Think yer man jist likes to argue the **** about everything . Maybe it's cos I'm a hun . He's a wee bitter spaz
People expressed the opinion that Burns lost. High Chief ***** is complaining about the scoring. I asked him how he scored it and he said that he never scored it. That is stupid.
Him Watt scored it to Beltran by two points. Not "at least two points". I scored it 114-113 to Beltran. It was a very close fight but for you to paint it as some kind of robbery is ****ing daft. If you know about boxing as you claim to do and you cite this fight as evidence of corrupt scoring, then you are a cock.
I did a bit of boxing when I was younger, in my Army days. They used to call me Rembrandt because I was always on the canvas. I got knocked down so many times I had a cauliflower arse.
You scored it 114 -113 . Watt had it Beltran by two points so did former world champion Alex Arthur Yet one judge managed to score it Burns 115-112 . Thats a turn around of 5 points to what our resident expert scored it while he was sitting on his couch scratching his balls and swigging Elderado . Your the cock . Burns was beaten and quite easily at that . The fact a draw was the outcome is evidence of the corruption you plank . It was a shocking decision . One of many.
I never saw the fight but the reports I read did say he was lucky to get the decision. Do you not just think it's more to do with some judges being a bit rubbish in their interpretation rather than some form of deep seated corruption?
Apart from the very blatantly obvious fact that a difference of two points doesn't constitute being "well beaten" in any mans language, you never scored the fight. I never claimed to be an expert, I just scored the fight as I saw it on the television. It was a close fight with a lot of close rounds. Watt scored the 11th a draw. I thought it was a Burns round. You never scored the fight at all chief. You can comment that on balance you think Beltran won. You can't say something is corrupt just because you don't like the outcome. That is ******ed.
I came out the ring after a particular fight where I got absolutely pummelled and my mate said to me "You had him worried" "He thought he'd ****ing killed you"
If this fight was a one off then sure you could put it down to ineptitude of a judge . How many times do we see these inexplicable results though . For three judges to score one fight so differently is .......pretty bizarre don't you think ?
So your not an expert then ? So how can you possible score a fight ? I know I'm not an expert so I don't even bother trying to score . Not many people do I would think . Well not if their normal that is . Do you know what Paddy why don't you google the fight and go read what the experts have to say about it . I bet you'll find none that think it was a close thing or any that think Burns deserved the draw .
So you don't score fights because you are not an expert but you are qualified enough to comment on how the experts scored it... Ok
Bizarre that people see things differently? Bizarre that people can have different opinions? No....not bizarre at all. In fact, quite usual.
