I wonder if AVB isn't the anti-Wenger. Just as Wenger will try to play fluid, attacking football no matter the opponent (well, almost...), AVB will try to dominate the midfield and push the other team back. Will it work? We shall see, but at least it looks like we've got the midfielders to give it a whirl.
I'd at least like to see a Plan B for when we go behind, which would involve breaking at speed, midfielders bombing forward into the box, and, erm, either of the two deep lying playmakers we no longer have kickstarting the move forward. Which reminds me: Rose and Walker got mediocre reviews at best against Arsenal, but their ability to get themselves free near the goal line and launch theoretically dangerous crosses was remarkable, and only exceeded by our inexplicable inability to get anyone forward to meet them except our undersized striker.
Why on earth wasn't Paulinho, at least, who's tall and very dangerous in the air, constantly in the box for these? I don't know how many times I saw a cross heading into a sea of red shirts.
I gave AVB high marks last year, mostly for macro-type things like getting the squad motivated and getting a lot of points out of a squad without a playmaker. But I also have to say he gets micro-decisions wrong like nobody else from time to time. Why not Holtby at halftime when everyone wanted him? Why Huddlestone against Chelsea? And for an even weirder one, why did he try Huddlestone and Carroll together three or four times last year? Of all the players for the "2", surely they're the last ones anyone else would try pairing...
Anyway, it's interesting to see a wide range of interestingly stated opinions from various posters. It may say as much about individual reaction to uncertainty as anything, because uncertainty is what defines this team at the moment.