Apparently Sess is on 68k a week I can't see WBA paying him that. He would have to take a big pay cut to Move there. I reckon he will go abroad.
Now lad, take it easy, calm down. A nice darkened room would be lovely now wouldn`t it? have one of these there now, isn`t that better?
Absolutely no need to merge you could have just added your post to a thread that was already there. If I was an old cynic I may have thought you just like to see your name as the thread starter. Thank **** I'm not an old cynic and just an old **** eh?
To be fair the forum last night was like a smackheads bedsit. A ****ing **** hole. Merging was needed desperately as the place was rife with repetitive negative threads, same old **** wherever you looked. I've just had to apologize to a fellow user because I did a Fletch article after he did because I didn't see it and the lad didn't get a single post.
I completely disagree. I posted on the threads I was interested in and missed the ones I wasn't. The only way I could do that was by having the original thread titles in view and not have to trawl through loads of **** I didn't want to read in the first place.
Tripped yourself up here mate. Ok. What made my Steven Fletcher more interesting than the Steven Fletcher article that Poolie Mackem Paul‎ posted before I did? You posted on mine but not his. It's ok, You can admit you didn't see amongst all the repetitive ****. I didn't. Or do you want to look like you're ignorant towards some members? Cause if you did see it and decided to post on a later thread of the same subject, then it will look that way.
How on earth have I tripped myself up? You posted a thread about a player and there was already a thread about the same player and that trips me up? You then decide I'm not clever enough to read different thread titles. What I will admit is I was probably reading the repetitive **** rather than this thread your in a lather about. You're talking as if I was sitting here waiting for you to post a thread. And the only ignorance is in your post and your high handed way of talking about threads you didn't start. Oh and your arrogance talking to me as if you're right and every other poster is wrong. All the repetitive ****? You mean negative threads you didn't like so want putting in one place? Why should you or anyone else decide what is and isn't negative or repetitive, I assume the OP would disagree with you? Are you saying the posters that post something you find negative don't have the right to post, or only post where you say? Who is going to be the arbiter of who has the right to post their own threads? If they feel they haven't got their point over in another thread, IMHO they have every right to post their own thread without censorship. Who was going to decide which threads were negative and repetitive you or PDC? Your arrogance is only outbalanced by your rudeness.
Two threads about the same subject, Gentleman's conduct on the forum is to post in the first. You didn't, you posted on the second. Simple Question. Why did you post on my thread? a. You didn't see the thread b. You saw it and ignored it. c. Something else which you'll no doubt explain. This is all I was asking. I'm not being rude or arrogant I'm just trying to understand why you didn't post in his thread as you've previously stated that the board wasn't a mess and you saw every thread fine. This is as Lehman as it comes.
You're not being rude or arrogant? "Or do you want to look like you're ignorant towards some members? Cause if you did see it and decided to post on a later thread of the same subject, then it will look that way." I'll post in any thread I ****ing want to, without having to answer to you or anyone else bonny lad. You also wont censor other posters on here if I have anything to do with it. Please list the repetitive threads that got you so angry! Please list the negative threads that got you so angry! I'm sure the members involved will be pleased to hear why you think they are boring and negative. Rather than fellow supporters with opposing views to your good self. I will list two repetitive threads for you, both posted yesterday, both by the same poster, just to help you out and to save you a bit of time. http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/227469-Lets-go-crazy-deadline-day-haaaaaaaaaawaaaaaaaaaay! http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/227407-11pm-2-9-13-deadline-day-thread And I defend unto death that he has every right to post them, this isn't a ****ing Stasis run board. I started out taking the piss on here, tongue in cheek with PDC ,which he took in good part and returned in full. You have jumped in with both feet to try and put me down, and quite frankly failed miserably and you have come across as a bit of an idiot.
****in hell mate, I'm not going to answer your question if you won't answer mine. For the record you are rude because you're answering a question with a question. Yes I've been a bit rude but it's nothing to how you behaved towards a mod to get your own way! So practice what you ****ing preach. I'm only making a point that merging has it's good points but you whined like a bitch until you got it stopped but some people think it has a place. Not over used, but more than not used at all. Somewhere in the middle. The negativity threads are irrelevant. it was merely an example of when too many threads on one subject mean unrelated threads can be missed. Forget negativity. Use some of our transfer target threads as an example. Oh we can't because The PDC Effect has worked his bollocks off all summer to make make a clogged up untidy forum not an issue. Got nowt but **** off you when he should have got a bit of gratitude. I don't want to censor anybody. But if I disagree I'm going to challenge it. It's a bloody football debate forum, it's the whole point of this site! You still haven't answered my question. Did you not post on the original Fletch thread because you didn't see it or did you ignore it? I know why you won't answer. It's because if you didn't see it it proves my point and if you ignored it and you admit it, then you'll come across ignorant. That's 3 times I've asked the question, can I have a answer please? If you won't answer the question then the only person who's an idiotic failure is you. pm me the answer if you want. We'll take it off the board. Not out to publicly mate a fool of you but I would like an answer.
Anyways, with Ji hopefully being sold we have no need to sell Sess and hes a much better option in our squad than out of it. That £68/Week is absolute bull**** like, its not Sess's wages that are the problem, at least he can justify part of his by playing nearly every game for us whereas Bardsley, Cattermole and Brown are the ones who are sucking the club dry so if anyone should be going its surely those ahead of Sess.
It sickens me reading anything to do with Sess being sold. I don't know why PDC is finding it difficult to accommodate him tactically, Sess can play up front, in the hole and in midfield. He is arguably the most creative player at the club who drifts in and out of the game...why ? bloody boredom probably. He thinks quicker and smarter than most of the players around him which makes the lads look like they are on a different wavelength. When we play well -he plays well and when he plays well - we do too. If we are in the market for a player with, 'the keys to unlock a defence' then I think you'll find this player will need all of Sess' attributes.....and how much is this player going to cost us eh ? If he goes, we loose a shed load of creativity, that's for sure ! Keep the Faith - Keep the Sess !
Agree, far worse players need to be out the door before Sess and lets face it Sess does nothing wrong in games, just because he doesnt score enough he gets slated even when players play much worse than him. The only thing that would be acceptable is if Sess leaves, we buy Sigurdsson but we shouldnt be selling to West Brom when they are arguably relegation candidates along with ourselves.
