A Forum...

Out of curiosity, can you say why I have been banned from your board?

 

So your comment "But perhaps you should have included definitions of "supporter" and "wumming" in the OP" is not aimed at Dai ?
If that's the case I apologise for reading something into it...

 

PGF,(Post 15).

As I've pointed out in an earlier response,I don't remember who threw the first stone,so it is unclear who was the aggressor,and who the reactionary.

What I am hoping for, in the interests of peace and harmony,is that if anyone finds a particular poster offensive in his opinions,ignore him.

 

For what it's worth,Stereo,I don't have a problem with PGF's post.

 

No need to apologise to me Stereo. My comments were not personal - but we all know what the debate is about.

 

Your vile post, I am gobsmacked you have to ask.

 

Taff,welcome to the debate. How is your hangover?

I note your comment re being "subjected to abuse for no apparent reason",and find if hard to sympathise too much.
Such behaviour is not exactly unheard of on your Forum,as you are doubtless fully aware.
I'm not sure exactly how long you have been posting on 606 Forums,but the atmosphere between the two sets of fans' became very hostile back in the old BBC days,and some of us remember it only too well.
Indeed,I have had to put up with it,even when visiting your Forum to express my sympathy at the death of an ex Cardiff player.
Someone,who will remain nameless,found my post to be "antagonistic".
Unfortunately,some people only look for negatives,thereby fuelling their agenda.

It would nice if abuse became a thing of the past,so let's hope we can all work towards that goal.

 

Agree Lib and I am fully behind a more harmonious debate and exchange of views. There will always be banter and of course rival fans will disagree. But let's keep it in perspective and hope all posters refrain from name calling and petty bickering.

 

wtf happened?

 

geez taff, you have the biggest 2 wummers on your board and until recently have done sfa about it until recently, and now it is back

 

Taff,

"Banter" --- my dictionary describes the meaning as, "to tease jokingly",and I don't think there are many,if any, on your Forum, who can take being teased,or indeed,understand the concept of it.

Abuse,now that's a whole different ball game.

 

I think you'll find the subject of Dai has come up numerous times in responce to your original OP, long before I posted Vetch, why is that?....do they have an agenda too?...........

 

You bring up some great points lib, most of which are the reason I havn't come back as yet.

 

.

Sorry dude, I just couldn't resist that when the opportunity rose.

 

It is a two way street Lib. It will take time for folk to adjust and some never will so we do what we can to control it. I cannot comment on other peoples thoughts but both boards have their share of provocative posters.

 

But I get banned for a joke that was not aimed at any poster?

 

I know it is not my call but why have a mod who doesn't post?

 

Joking about *****philia has no place on the Cardiff board or any board for that matter. The fact your comment was also libellous is equally irresponsible. You can make light of it here if you wish, makes no odds to me.

 

Oh come on, did you cover your ears everytime you attended the Liberty in the Championship? I understand it is your prerogative but it was a joke.

 

A moderator doesn't have to post, but I would expect him/her to do things behind the scenes. If that is what Chico would prefer doing then that is fine by me.