Common sense has prevailed at last. MPs have rejected possible UK military action against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's government to deter the use of chemical weapons. David Cameron said he would respect the defeat of a government motion by 285-272, ruling out joining US-led strikes. Yanks take note, this is what democracy is all about.
At least China will be happy. When they heard that we were going to invade Afghanistan, they thought it was daft, but when they heard that we were going invading in the middle east, the thought it was even syria...
I'm in two minds about this. It's quite obvious that the Assad regime needs toppled, probably would have made more sense to do this 2 years ago when the conflict started. On the other hand Afghanistan & iraq were 2 huge ****ups. Years upon years and billions spent trying to sort those places out and they're still ****ed up. Though when the rebels take control it will be good to see the likes of Abu Sakkar, the heart eating cannibal in charge of who to attack next.
Good to know no British lives will be risked sorting out problems that the Arab League should be dealing with.
Hafez Assad, 11-Year-Old Son Of Syrian President, 'In Facebook Rant' please log in to view this image
David Cameron's advisors could not contain their fury at Labour's decision not to back military action in Syria until after the conclusion of a UN inspection and report. “No 10 and the Foreign Office think Ed Miliband is a f***ing c**t and a copper-bottomed ****.
The Syrian women are certainly worth saving. https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=s...sia%2Fa-portrait-of-syrian-women.html;471;658
