There are quiet a few people on here that you've annoyed. I think your argument is flawed, especially when you are using a site which cannot be a reliable source unless there is actual proof from actual clubs.
Didn't even realise we were in for David Vaughan, but anyway Reading are going to win the race for him. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...e-1million-bid-Sunderlands-David-Vaughan.html
HDM reckons a move for Ntep in this window is unlikely, although we have been scouting him. Shame, I still think we need a wide player.
I perhaps should have used 'irritated', rather than 'fallen out'. And the point of the forum is debate, but many of your posts seem to be simple contradiction, rather than any reasoned debate. Still, you're free to post anything you like, you ming mong faced turd burglar...
I was joking about a post that a lot of the new posters seem to make regarding "cliqueyness". There aren't any cliques or gangs or groups or barbershop quartets. Or, you know, that's what we want you to think. One, two, three, four... MAMMY, HOW I LOVE YA.... take it away boys!
It took me a few times reading that to make sense of "do you pay subs to be a 'time will tell'" That's what excessive use of this forum does to you.
I'll put something forward at the next meeting. Don't forget we're having the live chat where we slag off everybody outside the clique at 8pm. For those of you that know the password I'll put the link up.