What the **** you banging on about... I asked Rebs a question as I was looking at him to expand on his reasons. He gave me an answer, some of which I agree with - particulary the waste of tax payer cash, then gave my take on it. His reasons may have been ridiculous, so I was intrested in what he had to say before responding.
I think you're confused; most people on here are imperturbable and rational folk with the ability to discourse without letting emotion triumph over reason
That was clever of you, if somewhat devious - you could have just asked him to expand then instead of being disingenuous. Have Reb's 'reasons' ever been ridiculous?
I don't know. Nobody has given me a credible reason to think otherwise. I don't think the crux of your argument with EC rests on whether I think I apply reason to debates or not. I feel my position on things is at very least considered. Moreso than many.
"argument"? Never, just a pleasant discourse to amuse ourselves before the big game ... though I do believe Pud took it a little too personally.
I must say that's very magnanimous of you - thanks ... though I think I'd better refrain from documenting my interpretation in case you neg rep me
I think he may have too. Of course denying it makes it an absolute certainty that he did. Not commenting means you have won the pleasant discourse. That is how these things work.
Privately seething..... Fact. EDIT: I forgot to capitalise the word fact..... Doesn't mean I am going to do it now, but just to let y'all know that I forgot.
