Not silly at all pal, just direct. your used to that hey? So Basically big RedNut your saying your happy with Sess when he's winning games for us eh?
For a start he didn't win the game for us but he did against Everton. only one game in that season he won for us & that says it all about sess.
By scoring a class goal doesn't mean you was man of the match. If I remember right sess was ****ing hopless in that game. the mig, rose & even ****ing cattermole had a better game.
The newcastle game the who team played well but in the Everton game sess was the best player & he scored the winning goal. only 1 match last season he won us & thats a fact.
talent -well you eith have it or you don't. but it's how you apply it that counts. i couldn't agree more on your summary tho. Sess frustrates the **** out of me..
That's why i love this forum.. Comment* Debate* Create!. I Don't have to agree with a ranga and in this case i won't You clearly outline sess only won 1 game for us but your not even thankful for that win..
I'm not bothered if you agree or not & just to make you feel abit better, THANK YOU SESS FOR GETTING US 3 POINTS AGAINST EVERTON XXXXX.
Sunderland boss Paolo Di Canio has moved to put an end to speculation over Stephane Sessegnon's future by insisting the forward is not for sale. Recent reports have linked the versatile Benin international with a move to Qatari side El Jaish, but he was in the Sunderland side that lost at home to Fulham on Saturday. And the Black Cats boss is adamant that Sessegnon will not be sold and remains a key part of the squad. "I have to be clear, I do not want to sell Sessegnon," the Italian told The Sun. "If anyone wants him, they would have to bring me a quality striker and a central midfield player. "Otherwise, for me, he is not for sale." http://www1.skysports.com/football/...io-insists-stephane-sessegnon-is-not-for-sale after yesterdays performance I wonder if the speculation is affecting him
He had a bad game for christ sake get a grip, theres some absolute women on here after match days. Eden Hazard had a quiet game today, similar to Sess's performance, Chelsea should get rid? Theres no way in hell we could replace him with 2 weeks to go and people who are advocating 4-4-2 need to follow MON back to dinosaur land. Yes he had a bad game and can be infuriating but surely you just drop him on the bench and then make him earn his place back before the mindless fantasy managers on here put him up for sale, the squad would be in tatters if we sold him, we should be adding to the squad in the next few weeks not weakening it as we are already short of players. There is no way I buy all this bullshit about people out the door before we can buy, we have just got rid of McClean and N'Daiye and not brought anyone in and still require a left-back, Cabral gets ****ed next game and we are down to your Vaughans and Gardners again, frightening how thin we are.
Saved us from relegation, also won us another point at home to Fulham 2-2 so 4 points, without them, DOWN.
Only a ****ing ****** would say sess keep us up. Fletcher's goals won us more points so he keep us up & thats a STAT ****ING FACT.
If that's the case the amount of time he's asleep probably cost us points as well. He is TOO inconsistent. On Saturday he was that bad he made Larsson look good.
SUNDERLAND are considering selling Stephane Sessegnon in order to fund the purchase of the creative midfielder that manager Paolo Di Canio craves. The Italian head coach is desperate to land a powerful playmaker, who can pull the strings in midfield and bring out the best in a new attack-minded 4-2-4 formation. He returned to the subject again at the weekend after Sunderland’s 1-0 home defeat to Fulham, insisting that sort of player could have made all the difference. But with the Black Cats – who lost out on Spurs midfielder Tom Huddlestone to Hull City last week – now struggling to manoeuvre in the transfer market, the club’s only option might be to sell the Benin international to fund more moves. That move would be unwelcome, although not unacceptable to Di Canio – who underlined that he wants to keep the former Paris St Germain star. But should Sessegnon – the subject of interest from Qatari side El Jaish – go, the Italian would push hard for a creative midfielder AND a replacement striker. Di Canio explained: “I have given my opinion already: Sessegnon is not for sale, and we need to bring in one central midfield player. “I don’t want to sell him. But if he is sold, we have to bring in a central midfield player and another striker. “If someone wants to sell Sessegnon, I won’t criticise if they bring me a striker with quality and experience and a central midfield player – but not one brought in as cover, not a kid – I need a central midfielder with a background, good quality, physical presence and experience.” Di Canio revealed his pecking order for new signings before the transfer window closes – with a left-back only third in line on his list. The Black Cats have been strongly linked with a move for Juventus left-back Paolo De Ceglie in recent days, with several sources claiming that a season-long loan deal for the 26-year-old could be finalised this week. But Di Canio says that that strengthening the left-back position – seen as a priority after Danny Rose’s return to Spurs in the summer from a season-long loan – is not as important to him right now as the need to strengthen across the midfield. “If we can bring in only one player, without selling Sessegnon, it would have to be absolutely a central midfielder,” he said. “If we can bring two – it would be a central midfield player and a winger; and then if three players, a central midfielder, a winger and a left-back.” The fact that Di Canio sees getting in a winger as more pressing than bringing in a left-back might suggest his interest in Greek winger Charis Mavrias is not necessarily at an end. Di Canio would love more signings, but accepts that financial restraints are limiting options. “What would be perfect for me would be a left-back, two central midfielders, a winger and another spare man – that would be five players,” he said. “That would be perfect but there has already been a revolution – we have spent money and we need to be sensible in this moment. “We might be able to bring in only one player, in which case a central midfielder. Two? A central midfielder and a winger. Three? Central midfielder, winger, left-back and so on. “This is the reality of the situation and it is not a criticism. We have to be honest and intelligent and we need to have balance. “I cannot criticise the club because they already spent money. “But obviously if they can make more sacrifices it would be better for the club because we would be a better side, suffer less, finish better in the league and help the company. “I know Ellis (Short) has no problem in terms of money but the club in general can be better. “In my opinion, these are worthwhile investments in the long run, but we will see. We have a strategy to work with what we can do. “I don’t have the pressure of bringing players in, that is for others – but I understand we have to be sensible. “But we have spent much less on players this summer than in the past, much less than in the past – I have to be clear.”
It's amazing to think that we pay Sess and Bardsley a combined 100k to make nil impact! We should sell Sess and make a show of ****sley until his contract is up.
Hoy vaughan and catts into the equation and we are talking £170k odd a week, reckon de fanti and co could bring in pdc's desired 5 players within that budget
