1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Article: West Bromwich Albion v Southampton match thread | Southampton FC, Football

Discussion in 'Southampton' started by tomw24, Aug 15, 2013.

  1. TheSecondStain

    TheSecondStain Needs an early night

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    39,383
    Likes Received:
    8,819
    Yep, good goal denied.
     
    #261
  2. Schad

    Schad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2011
    Messages:
    17,837
    Likes Received:
    13,160
    There was a player offside who probably affected play; guessing that's what was flagged.
     
    #262
  3. Joe!

    Joe! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    18,397
    Likes Received:
    71
    Getting worried that WBA will eventually get a counter attack right. Our possession has been excellent though.
     
    #263
  4. IMO Im ITK

    IMO Im ITK Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,581
    Likes Received:
    2
    I agree, but how he was affecting play i have no idea.
     
    #264
  5. I Sorry I Ruined The Party

    I Sorry I Ruined The Party Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2012
    Messages:
    4,880
    Likes Received:
    1,992
    Yes, correct offside call unfortunately for us.
     
    #265
  6. RSS

    RSS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    11,166
    Likes Received:
    9,392
    63% possession in our favour. We are playing very well indeed so far. Not creating a massive amount, but I'm very pleased so far.
     
    #266

  7. Schad

    Schad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2011
    Messages:
    17,837
    Likes Received:
    13,160
    J-Rod went for the header, and it narrowly escaped him in getting to Lallana...kinda hazy whether that constitutes affecting play, I guess.
     
    #267
  8. Joe!

    Joe! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    18,397
    Likes Received:
    71
    I'm not gonna be complaining about that. The rule is stupidly hazy.
     
    #268
  9. Qwerty

    Qwerty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2011
    Messages:
    14,006
    Likes Received:
    3,515
    tbh he probably just flagged Lallana when he headed it. It was close, but he was on.
     
    #269
  10. Mikey

    Mikey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2012
    Messages:
    4,421
    Likes Received:
    1,396
    Didn't take long for there to be a controversy about a rule that was meant to be clarified by the new ruling haha, think by the new rules JRod was probably offside, but the wording is just so vague still.
     
    #270
  11. Schad

    Schad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2011
    Messages:
    17,837
    Likes Received:
    13,160
    Yeah. "Open to interpretation" isn't the half of it, and I do think that Jay probably had an effect.
     
    #271
  12. Clem Fandango

    Clem Fandango Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2012
    Messages:
    4,618
    Likes Received:
    604
    New signings doing well. Boruc has already done a couple of crazy things. JWP looking fantastic.
     
    #272
  13. 9043graham

    9043graham Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    976
    Likes Received:
    485
    DTLW explained that if your actions affect the opositions train of thought whilst being off side, it will be flagged whether you are the intended player or not. confusing.
     
    #273
  14. Qwerty

    Qwerty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2011
    Messages:
    14,006
    Likes Received:
    3,515
    The new bit of offside (that is different) only refers to distracting/interfering with opponents. There weren't any in the vicinity for Jay to interfere with. It was an error, old rules or new.
     
    #274
  15. fran-MLs little camera

    fran-MLs little camera Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    69,236
    Likes Received:
    24,809
    Not specifically talking about this offside decision, I have always felt that any player who makes a GK/defender have a double take is affecting play. I think they are trying to sort that out...the result will be more off side decisions this season.

    Still saying that WBA having no chances at the moment...all Southampton...we all know where this is leading:emoticon-0107-sweat
     
    #275
  16. Clem Fandango

    Clem Fandango Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2012
    Messages:
    4,618
    Likes Received:
    604
    I think J-Rod being directly infront of the gk with a cross swinging in his direction is interfering with play. They should just go back to the old rule of you're off-side, or you're not. Also bring back the "daylight" guide.
     
    #276
  17. fran-MLs little camera

    fran-MLs little camera Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    69,236
    Likes Received:
    24,809
    Surely not....is it possible that Mauricio knows what he is doing<whistle>
     
    #277
  18. Le Tissier's Laces

    Le Tissier's Laces Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    43,135
    Likes Received:
    49,102
    Whisper it quietly, but I think Lovren has been excellent so far. That's a cue for a catastrophic mistake second half isn't it?

    As has been mentioned, Wanyama is a tank. JWP has been great and Chambers has done nothing wrong at all.

    All very positive. Now we've just got to not make an idiotic mistakes that undo our good play.....
     
    #278
  19. Dan

    Dan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    16,211
    Likes Received:
    132
    The keeper? He was positioned right by Jay.
     
    #279
  20. Mikey

    Mikey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2012
    Messages:
    4,421
    Likes Received:
    1,396
    Apart from the keeper, quite possibly. If the keeper thought JRod was going for the ball it would make him react, would like to see it again but I think Jay either jumped or motioned to jump for it.

    Don't know why they think the change of rules makes things clearer, now instead of the referee/linesman having to decide if a player is interfering with play, he has to read the defenders' mind to decide if his 'thought process' is being affected.
     
    #280

Share This Page