I don't think they would want Catts, he is too unreliable for discipline. If it's true they are offering anything over £10m for him we should take it, a good ROI for him. As for Henderson, we should definitely keep him unless silly offers (£30m+) start rolling in.
Because I don't want to be one. Fair enough. I honestly don't know much about him, and it was just what I gathered, but if he's better, then that's fair do's. I just don't understand Liverpool's plan. They have a big owner now and I honestly expected them to be pumping in ****loads of cash to bring in TOP players and get themselves back up near the top 4. Cattermole might be good, but I know that he isn't great or exceptional, so I can't see him being a midfield maestro which will add to the quality of their side. Unless Dalglish is trying to add depth, or thinks that Cattermole really can be that good.
Sell them Cattermole for me is an average player no better no worse, he does a job for us but for that sort of money snap Liverpools hands off Henderson I would sell him aswell sick of hearing about or he's a local lad, I couldn't care if we had a team full of ghanains or Paraguayans aslong as they do the job on the pitch. He is a prospect but for 28m for the pair we could go out and along with the money for Bent and drastically improve the squad