It's a lot of money on an unknown player, whose not got a great record. Plus, we've had some pretty ****e strikers in recent years. Proschwitz was supposed to be good last season and wasn't. Oh and my song for would be S-A-G-B-O to the tune of "She is Disco". Just need to think of football related words to fir the acronym. [video=youtube;O0ces1RYmVE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0ces1RYmVE[/video]
What's happening then ? He's out for a bloody long lunch ! Bickering about sell-on fees was the last I heard..
Our talent for protracted transfers is legendary. We tend to piss about a lot, but I can't see any reason why this deal wouldn't happen. Why can't we do it like Norwich? Bid today, bid accepted, player goes for medical, probably done by tomorrow.
We only had a bid accepted two days ago and the bloke still had to nip over from France, I think 'protracted' is a bit of a stretch.
As long as he signs does it matter how long it takes. ? The cheaper we get him for the bigger % sell on fee Evian deserve imo. 20% is fair as an example.
I suppose, but the Austin one seemed to go on forever, even though it eventually fell through. There isn't a rush, but getting deals done and dusted has hardly been our forte in the past.
This makes him sound like a bit of a risk... http://squawka.com/news/2013/07/25/...riker-transfer-scouting-report/2013072514968?
A big risk to take, Lets hope he doesn't turn out to be another useless signing, We certainly need to sign a guaranteed goalscorer
Please can we place this on the same pedestal as FAT. Example, "Don't mind him, he's just being an Erik." "Sorry for being an Erik, I've had a bad day."
