1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Watford sign 8 players from Udinese

Discussion in 'Leicester City' started by BigFox, Jul 19, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Proud Fox

    Proud Fox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    24,239
    Likes Received:
    1,496
    <laugh> Says OLM with his monopoly bets and his promise that Nigel wasnt leaving Hull. I have never heard such lunacy

    He even pretended to ITK at Hull
     
    #141
  2. babyhornetdan

    babyhornetdan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Messages:
    8,729
    Likes Received:
    237
    Yeah I never really rated Wes Morgan, Anya made him look like a complete mug. He turned him inside and left him for dead countless times!
     
    #142
  3. Raphael

    Raphael Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2013
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    62
    I think I now understand the Leicester fans problem - they are all accountants. They are happy that if we have a rich owner (we have) then we can buy whoever we can afford - but they just don't like our balance sheet. If it showed £15 million debt they would be happy as Larry ( or Harry?) with us as we would be a "normal" club with debt. That is probably about what we would have had to pay in an open market. Please correct me Leicester fans if I have misunderstood you on this.

    Forget other clubs paying our wages - they didn't last year and won't this. So it is just about transfer values - and forget about another club having our debt - they don't it is our Owner's debt - just as some of you have eloquently explained with your own Owner's debt. If we had paid market value the Pozzos could at any time write off that debt - £15m is small beer to them - a lot less burdensome than the £100m I have heard spoken about Leicester.

    I suspect most of our players values will only increase in the next year so if we sell them we will make a profit and we will have to pay tax on a larger gain than if we had not got them for free - boy - you guys should be happy - we are going to be paying the taxman a lot of money.

    Last point for now - embargo was a lazy journalists' word for our transfer situation. We were never under any embargo - we just had to get the FA to review our transfers because our previous Owner screwed the club out of money which went into his bank not ours - they wanted to check that under the Pozzos we were back on the straight and narrow - which thankfully we are.

    Look guys - Leicester supporters are generally a fair minded intelligent bunch in my experience and it may be that the last couple of games we had got to you - but in reality we have not done anything wrong - the Pozzos are entitled to put their debt into whichever club they choose and it will make precious little difference. They want a successful Watford and are prepared to bankroll it as it could be worth a lot of money to them in the long run - after all they are businessmen. But don't demonize Watford - we are a small club lucky enough to have rich owners for a while. After our recent owners I think we deserve to be cut a little slack don't we?
     
    #143
  4. Proud Fox

    Proud Fox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    24,239
    Likes Received:
    1,496
    Out of interest how much are the Pozzo's worth?

    Our owner Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha was valued at $1.6B last week

    No ones has a problem with you getting players from Udiense, its how your doing it that has got everyone's back up


    Switch roles a minute and imagine you was a Udiense fan and the club was just giving players away and losing money doing it. It would piss you off. Do you really think the Udiense fans care about what happens at Watford?
     
    #144
  5. AKCJ

    AKCJ Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    21,874
    Likes Received:
    2,934
    What is so difficult for the watford fans to understand?

    We have no problem with your club links.

    We have no problem with the players you're buying.


    The problem is that you're avoiding FFP regulations by buying these players for Udinese and then sending them on 'loan' (yes, I know it's not a loan technically but it's very similar) for nothing.

    These players will never play for Granada/Udinese despite signing for them. They've only signed to play for Watford.

    You'd obviously still have to pay these players their wages. It's just their transfer fees that won't be accounted for that isn't fair.

    If you can't see that you're bypassing the FFP rules that everyone else has to abide by then I give up. As if last year wasn't enough of a shambles with your loans.
     
    #145
  6. Raphael

    Raphael Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2013
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    62
    To be honest I have no idea how much they are worth - but they are Italian so that says a lot :)

    I know it is the loan and now the free transfers that are getting people's backs up - but to be honest as I jokingly implied earlier these are really only accounting issues. The Pozzos could have sold them for market value - let's guess about £15m and Watford would now owe the Pozzos £15m - but debts to an owner are only a problem if he decides to leave. He could even convert that debt into shares if he chose so we could still be debt free. Udinese will be happy as Pozzo took them from obscurity to long term Champions League participants. Would you mind if your owner took surplus players - and this is what these ones are - they are not the cream and would not be in the first team - and gave them experience at another club - especially if you knew you would get them back if he wanted. Remember too that the loans were done because Pozzos took over Watford just before the start of last season and did not have time to transfer them - so they always said in time they would make them transfers - and now they have. (If I were being honest I would add that I suspect the Pozzos did not trust our former owner - rightly as it turns out - and did not want to give him assets to claim if they got into a fight with him. He screwed Watford over and wuld do the same to Portsmouth if he gets his way. Thanks to him we had that transfer review system( not embargo) this summer - he put our money from transferring Danny Graham into his personal bank account.
     
    #146
  7. Proud Fox

    Proud Fox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    24,239
    Likes Received:
    1,496
    I wonder if Top owns any shares in Leicester City.

    He could buy Hinckley United and buy players for us and just send them here on free transfer or Hinckley just buy academy players off us for 30M allowing us to carry on doing what we want to do while staying within FFP guildlines

    The Watford fans would soon moan then
     
    #147
  8. Raphael

    Raphael Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2013
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    62
    FFP is not yet in so we are bypassing no existing rules. FFP is designed to stop clubs getting into debt that they cannot repay and then going into liquidation owing OTHERS money. IN this instance the only ones who would be owed money are the Pozzos themselves - so FFP will not be breached. We are not getting into debt so have no issues. I think you are getting a bit too hung up on the FFp issue and not properly understanding what it is coming in for
     
    #148
  9. Raphael

    Raphael Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2013
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    62
    No we would not I assure you :)
     
    #149
  10. Guy1960

    Guy1960 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2013
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    7
    Why would we moan?

    and as you said yourself ownership of more than one club in England is not permitted.
     
    #150

  11. Proud Fox

    Proud Fox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    24,239
    Likes Received:
    1,496
    We dont know if Top has any shares. If he doesnt there is nothing stopping him. If he does he cant simple sign his shares over to his Dad (Vichai)
     
    #151
  12. Proud Fox

    Proud Fox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    24,239
    Likes Received:
    1,496
    If your signing players on long term contracts off course it will effect FFP. Their contracts will run into when it starts
     
    #152
  13. superhorns

    superhorns Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2013
    Messages:
    11,075
    Likes Received:
    867
    Arn't you the guy that predicted the Watford loans would not return? - you look pretty silly now
     
    #153
  14. Proud Fox

    Proud Fox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    24,239
    Likes Received:
    1,496
    Your best 2 loans wont be returning though. Matej Vydra doesnt want to come back and I highly doubt Jose will let Chalobah go on loan to a championship team
     
    #154
  15. Bolton's Boots

    Bolton's Boots Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    35,381
    Likes Received:
    14,114
    What a load of complete and utter tosh.

    The players will never play for Udinese/Granada? Take a look at their career stats for god's sake - they already have. Of course they have only signed to play for Watford - that's the way these things work, or hadn't you realised that?

    We still have to pay their wages? Give that man a gold medal in stating the bleeding obvious - of course we have to. What he obviously doesn't - and can't possibly - know is how much the wages are that are being paid to player. All he needs to know is that our club don't actually pay inflated wages to under-performing 'stars' the way that certain others do, which is why we are not in financial trouble but most of those certain others are.

    The transfer fees won't be accounted for? How, pray tell, can you possibly and unequivocally state something like that? Do you have unfettered access to sets of financial accounts for a year that has nowhere near ended yet, that haven't even been drawn up yet?

    I suggest you do give up before you make a bigger idiot of yourself than you already have...
     
    #155
  16. superhorns

    superhorns Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2013
    Messages:
    11,075
    Likes Received:
    867
    Vydra may actually come back but not sure he would get into the team due to the quality of the other signings
     
    #156
  17. Proud Fox

    Proud Fox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    24,239
    Likes Received:
    1,496
    <laugh> He would walk straight into your team and you know it
     
    #157
  18. superhorns

    superhorns Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2013
    Messages:
    11,075
    Likes Received:
    867
    Perhaps we should loan him to you guys to even things up a bit, maybe you could stop the hoof ball then?
     
    #158
  19. Bolton's Boots

    Bolton's Boots Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    35,381
    Likes Received:
    14,114
    Dear god - another one <doh>

    So Vydra is in regular communication with you is he? He hasn't actually made any public comment one way or the other, anything mentioned in the media has been straight from his agent, not him. Maybe you should speak to him tonight about his plans for next season - or maybe just wait for the announcement that's coming early next week...

    As for Chalobah, I doubt too many expected him to return anyway - but he certainly wasn't our best loan last season, that honour went unanimously to The Professor.
     
    #159
  20. NZHorn

    NZHorn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    5,318
    Likes Received:
    1,666
    Finally, some reasoned debate. I can understand your concerns, Leicester fans. I think this whole episode is another example of how football has been taken away from the fans, who are the only constant, and become a way of generating, and losing, a lot of money. Do I like the Pozzos business model? I prefer it to our club becoming the ego-driven play thing of a rich owner, a la Chelsea, but I pine for the old days of a local businessman running clubs.

    The Pozzos model is to treat players as commodities. Move them around to wherever they will gain greatest value before selling them on. At the moment they are trying to get Watford up to speed. In the future we will be sending players on to other sides within the Pozzo orbit. I don't think it is cheating because the game is about making money. The football competition is a side issue.
     
    #160
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page