Interesting thread on ClaretsMad....http://boards.footymad.net/forum.php?tno=104&fid=297&sty=2&act=1&mid=2112525350
a tad ot.. but i remember oozing with excitement after this game for the potential of these two [video=youtube;GADsTA4DQlE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GADsTA4DQlE[/video]
Well if you read the threads it looks like it could be true, and they are all seem to be under the impression that it is us that have got him. Another one in on the cheap or loan and we should be well sorted in the striker department.
I still think we could do with two strikers in on loan tbh if we're only getting Austin in on a perm, I think he'll do well, but he's still a gamble. You can never have too many strikers in the prem, especially when some of ours probably won't score for a few games at a time. (Just being realistic).
Don't understand the reasoning behind this... We either need 2 permanent striker or one permanent and 2 loans? What difference does it make what deal they come on?
It's on Sky transfer now as an ''we understand'' http://www1.skysports.com/football/...-on-signing-of-Burnley-striker-Charlie-Austin
I must confess that - despite "In Bruce we trust" - I'm absolutely cacking myself, waiting on the revelation: WHICH STRIKERS HAVE WE GOT?