Maybe we will wait and see who we can (or can't) bring in before deciding on Gedo? I'm still worried that Elmo will not stand up to the rigours of the Premier League after his unsuccessful time at the Stadium of Lightweights.
I don't think Bruce is really interested in Gedo at all, I don't think he was particularly interested in him the first time he came, it was Assem who drove the signings of Gedo and Fathi.
I’d be surprised if anyone else signed Gedo under us so again I’d agree we do have the luxury of being able to wait and see. Also, not sure on our squad size at the minute, but we’re limited to 25 are we not? Could this be a factor, or are we well short on that (I think U21s are exempt). I think we need to see the Elmo who had the adventure of his first loan spell other wise he’ll certainly be ****.
He got played because we'd run out of options, he got off to a flyer so continued to get picked, but he couldn't keep it up. That may, or may not be down to injury, but I don't think Bruce was impressed at all. He was even less impressed with Fathi, which is a shame, as I think he's quite a tidy player.
Seems i was was wrong Bob. This thread is morphing into a football related topic,maybe your words are sinking in after all. I'd like to see Gedo back,if he passed a medical,he'd be cheap and i think he'd have scored more goals if he didn't get injured.
But comedy isn't about justification. You don't tell a joke and then explain why you did it. You just tell it and then get a response; if I was to tell a joke about black people to my black mates, they just laugh. It isn't about trying to offend people or prove something isn't offensive, it's offensive to you and anybody else who takes it that way. But the joke was never intended to offend anybody, any jokes seldom are. I shouldn't have to justify myself to anybody, if people have a problem with what I'm saying then that's tough tits for them, they either need to not listen or simply not read it in the first place. I mean, with a title like "Worst jokes ever, how far can we lower the bar?", what was the best you were hoping for upon opening that thread? A couple of knock knock jokes?
True. And I'd play 442 I think in the majority of games, though I accept there is a case for 352 on occasion.
You just don't get it do you? If you want to see a not-quite-evolved knuckle dragging twat just find a mirror. Anyone who can seriously compare a debate about Thatcher with their so-called perverted right to enjoy "jokes" about having sex with 2 year olds is a sick ****. The truth is I think a lot of people (including me) have been pretty guarded in our criticism of some of the vile **** you and others posted last night, but as I said posters will decide what they think you are based on what you've written. For me you can **** off as soon as you like.
OK I will strike a deal with you, I will behave if you loosen up. Hows that? SB is synonymous with 4-4-2. personally I am not sure about that formation, I dont think it is as fluid as 3 5 2 , but TWT.
Funnily enough more people voted for her than against her, so obviously not a despised as you may think.
Depends, I have Jewish heritage and despite the Holocaust being a horrific and tragic thing I still find the odd Jew joke funny. If you live a life where you dare not say anything in public because it might offend someone, then you may as well stitch your mouth closed. Everyone will disagree with one another and some people will be offended by other people's opinions. It doesn't mean you have to censor your opinions. By doing that everyone on the planet would become a Yes Man.
"Anyone who can seriously compare a debate about Thatcher with their so-called perverted right to enjoy "jokes" about having sex with 2 year olds is a sick ****." No-one did. You revelling in her death (or anyone else death ) is tasteless and offensive. Obscene jokes are also offensive. Not for me to quantify how much or make a comparison- just saying they are on the wrong side of the line.
