Saw a stat earlier that said; if you took away Suarez's league goals this season, Liverpool would have still finished seventh (theoretically speaking of course)
Saurez spends half the season in the stands banned for being a plonker, so Spurs are the biggest Losers.(good name for a TV show)
Interesting one. While Tottenham look to have a stronger team without Bale, statistically they don't. Reckon as teams go Liverpool are a year off Spurs though, so probably Liverpool.
Suarez missed a grand total of five league games this season, more than a lot of players miss through injury or rest. Bale played thirty-three league games this season too. Both also played forty-four games in total this year. Good call
Both teams could recover on the field quite quickly as is usually the case when a supposed indespensible player leaves a team. The biggest loss would be to Spurs in terms of Global marketing as the media everywhere loves a 'superstar'. You can be sure that Levy is very well aware of this. Suarez loss to Pool might well be a media gain, he's not exactly loved is he! There you are a serious answer to a tongue in cheek thread.
I think Pool would be weaker because Sewer makes his presence felt more on the pitch, and Bale can be pushed around more. Its not always about goals, and assists,
The original 'question' is more of a hope. My answer is clearly Spurs. Happy now angel or perhaps more devil.
Only the OP can answer if it was a true question or not, but I fail to see why you think it is a hope
If this is not a wind up, I think the answer u want can be simply sought. Both teams have had to do without their starman for periods this season. If you look at the records I think the answer is fairly obvious, that is assuming that both squads stay the same and do not reinvest any of the money. And if you did all that u will see u, simply put, are wrong
