...who can't even bring himself to mention a PFA player of the year nominee, and who doesn't mention either of the two outstanding January signings in the league. I know that Fat Garth simply loathes us and can't bring himself to mention us, unless its simply not possible to avoid (i.e. Sturridge scoring a hattrick), but really, can he be so blindingly biassed to not even mention some outstanding performers, simply because they play for LFC? You bet you arse he can't... http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22574993
He doesnt even pick players in correct positions. On right wing he should pick the best ring winger, not stick some one in a position they have not played all season.
Hes a ****, and since the beeb football department moved to Salford Quays hes like a pig in **** with rest of the anti LFC mob.
Am I right in that Suarez goal against Newcastle is also not listed in the goal of the season on MOTD?
Exactly, any football pundit with half a brain would think that was total pish! I'd have gone for these instead of those above: De Gea, Baines, Jags, Suarez...
Correct (Bias Alert), but come on, it was technically perfect! Regarding RvPs goal.. anyone can get lucky with a volley every now and then, I've done it once and I'm ****e!
Same except Cech for De Gea, think he's been a lot more consistent. Crooks is a tool, as said by someone else he picks players out of position in his TOTW. I remember seeing something like Bale Suarez and Tevez in centre midfield once, moron.
He's absolutely ******ed. Did you know? Baines played every league game for Everton (compared to Evra's 34) and made 44 total appeareances (compared with Evra's 42). He also scored 5 league goals and 2 in the FA cup, compared to Evra's 4 league goals. Everton also conceded fewer goals than Man Utd.
Evra over Baines is a complete howler IMO. But Coutinho - 7 assists, 3 goals in just 13 appearances (924minutes), not a mention (Mata - his pick 17 assists, 11 goals in 35 apps [2727 mins]). Sturridge - 10 goals, 5 assists in 14 appearances (1085 minutes), not a mention (RvP - his pick 26 goals, 15 assists in 38 apps [3123 mins]).. The bias is just so bad and so obvious. It is damaging to the credibility of the BBC Sports department to let this loon make his choices without at least applying some kind of editorial process to negate the worst excess of bias...
Ahd Crooks goes on about Carrick Much to the annoyance of some, I have compared the 31-year-old to Paul Scholes. However the 'quiet assassin' has proved that he is capable of filling Scholes's boots and that's the reason why Sir Alex Ferguson decided against spending a fortune on Wesley Sneijder. Carrick is the perfect player to guide David Moyes and Manchester United into the post-Ferguson era. Sneijder decided his own future not Alex. And Carrick the new Scholes They are nothing alike. Crooks has to be the biggest ****ing idiot in football journalism bar none
AHHHHHHAAAAAAAA!!!! did corrks really write that baout michael carrick! thats is the funnist thing i've read since the dandy in 1992.
Garth Crooks isn't biased imo, he's just a ****ing idiot. Every time he opens his mouth, he largely spouts total ****e. Guzan? Evra over Baines? RvP on the left wing? He's a clueless melt.
