I don't understand the criteria for football shirts at all. Everyone seems to want the most plain shirt possible, devoid of any pattern, yet now Nike have given us one it's not good enough. What exactly is not to like about that design if it's plain you're after?
The best designs are simplest and most instantly recognizable ones, the ones that are not ****ed about with. Why re-invent the wheel?
Is that the reason? I wasnt being rhetorical when I asked the above question btw, I genuinley meant it.
That's twice Ive agreed with you today, worrying... All I can assume is cos it would be very close to the Umbro one of 09/10 but it's still not a good enough reason in my eyes.
That blue ruins it. Either it should be completely white, or a navy blue like on the older England kits.