is this genuine?

I actually want to cry.

 

It isnt the porn I thought was going on the shirt......

 

would you rather our sponsor was redtube?

 

If Cash Converters are to be our new sponsors, it will go down like a lead balloon at Hull City Council who spend money and time trying to improve the image of the City.
It will be a PR disaster for both the club and the City.

 

It's a good job we're not involved in any sensitive negotiations with them then isn't it.

 

God I hope the away shirt is better then that or It'l be a new this season's shirt to wear next season for me.

 

It's not photoshopped - 100% - I've done too much photo retouching to know that. However, looking at it and comparing it to Stoke's, there are one or two small differences - the type of thing someone may get wrong when trying to make a copy, to sell to make a quick buck at some gullible person's expense.

 

I think it has been Photoshopped. Very well, mind.

If you look at the black background for the cash converter logo there is pixel bleed, from the white to the black. That mysteriously stops when the black background for the logo borders with the black stripe of the shirt.

Also that label hanging from the neck looks very odd.

 

I have a reply from the seller, its genuine and was won by her husband at a charity auction...?

 

****ing ****ing ****ing atrocious !!!

if this is real it'll be the first season in years i havnt bought the home shirt.

 

I dont think it looks genuine, the badge and label dont look right and the stripes dont look black enough.

Time will tell i suppose

 

I just think it's a very cheap slap on logo - light from the 'plastic effect' will create the overlapping pixels.

The label looks odd to me too, plus:

why would the logo be different to the one on Motherwell's shirt?
http://fcbusiness.co.uk/cms/thesite/public/uploads/news_large/1305712293_94.jpg

The Stoke shirt has a watermark/sweatband thing in a circle at the bottom of the 'V' at the back - this one doesn't. The 'V' also comes round to join the stripes on this one - it doesn't on the Stoke one.

 

What looks odd about it?

When you buy the shirts aren't there usually 2 or 3 tags hanging on one of those horrible plastic things? The picture just looks to me like they've lined up with each other.

 

It's not, it's the same logo but put on a background so it stands out from the stripes.

 

I got that message as well. How has a city shirt been auctioned off anywhere and OLM not found out? Something's not right there!

 

coz there was links on google about it

 

how com theres no folds on the sponsors logo? it's as if someones photoshopped a cash converters picture on it

 

I'm picking it up on the Adidas logo being in black.

You can't tell from Stoke's home kit because it's red and white, but Adidas seem to have made the logo and stripes white on all their kits. When you look at Stoke's away kit it's the same template as the home kit but in blue and black stripes (like Inter Milan). The adidas logo, the adidas stripes, and that piss poor excuse for a collar are still in white.

 

what charity and when? easy to say it was an auction,harder to prove it

 

A few things look odd about it besides being naff. Theres no printed logo/details in the inside back of the neck, and why have the cash converters in a black box when white like the Motherwell one would look just fine.

They way I see it somebody bought a blank template for their 5 aside or whatever and thought, 'oh this looks like it could be a Hull City shirt' an hour later, a few t-shirt transfers...