Prefer Watford as they are my local team from when I was a kid, however I can't see either team doing much in the Prem next year. Palace don't have the quality (especially with Zaha off) and Watford are losing most of their squad (and have a transfer embargo on them I believe?!).
Yup, one pretty grim team in the premiership next season. Could they be troubling the lowest points tally record? Never seen the point of getting promoted with a team of loanees, they all just bugger off and you are left with the dross that couldn't get you promoted the season before and couldn't get into the 1st team this time round. And Palace haven't got any money (Zaha money won't go very far in the Premiership) and have been a little bit solid and dreary in a strange ol' Championship season.
Watford, for the simple fact they finished 3rd. Apart from Palace being 4pts off, Holloway brought Charlie Adam into the PL. please log in to view this image
1 goal in 20 odd appearances prior.Yes,a dumb PL team should sign him up! I wonder if Moyes first request is a glance at Fergie's United no limit checkbook......then hand him the smelling salts!
Yeah, Zaha has been pretty anonymous since the new year. Apparently been playing a bit of the ol' 'Big Time Charlie' already. Moyes has some work to do with that squad. Zaha back out on loan once Moyes has taken a look at him?
No, they're spawn! They've also picked up a number of habits from your senior players, unfortunately. A nice bout of petulance and stamping on an opposition player and that was only in the half-hour that I saw.
Winning the League 1 play-offs used to get you a bonus at City. What haughty, supercilious, conceited tossers they've become.
You're probably joking about this, but two of their youngsters actually did do something similar. Thibaut Courtois and Kevin De Bruyne, two Belgian internationals who are out on loan at Atletico Madrid and Werder Bremen. The former started 'seeing' the latter's girlfriend behind his back. Both are being linked with moves this summer pretty heavily, though.