Welcome back party

Lets have a party welcoming back all those who have left and come back

Today's guest of honour is our esteemed Dai

 

Hell am I invited or what?.........................

 

No piss off to QPR

 

They won't have me, I've tried I tell you!................

 

Wonder if we could pay them too take you ??

 

It's a pretty lonely party this, only phil and I here would it help if I buy the drinks ?

 

Ohhh, go on then.

 

Thanks for joining, now what do you want tap water or bottled water ?

 

It think its a lonely party because most people don't actually give a **** about your guest of honour Daiswan

Why posters feel the need to spunk off over him when he aint around is beyond me, the content has been great with intresting debate since his banning but non the less there seem to be people who cant live without constant bickering on this board and feel that the bloke is hard done by when he gets ****ed off for acting like a muppet. .

Sad that some of you talk about him, to me its just undermining the good work our MODS have done recently.


Enjoy the Party

 

Not much of a party when the principle victim,oh sorry,guest,can't be bothered to show his ass.

 

Well it would be a boring ****ing world if everyone agreed with everyone. And basically if you don't like the party Norway, don't let me get in the way of the door for you.

The fact is Dai and I have argued like hell over the years, and he talks some sense at times. But some are not mature enough to take discussion on fora like this with a pinch of salt obviously.

And I don't see how talking about him undermines the moderators, frankly that is just pure crap Norway and I'm surprised that you have said it. Musty for one wants him to come back, Chico is cool on it one way or the other.

Whatever happens Dai has much right to post on here than any other poster, getting him banned is childishness in the extreme, has he gone beyond the ****ers on the general forum with their sick as **** humour ? Thought not !!

 

"getting him banned is(was)childishness in the extreme".

I fully agree with you Jager. It should not have happened.

Double standards abound on this Forum,and Dai gets singled out too often.

 

Jager- Sorry that you feel the need to take my comments to heart, they wernt directed at you specifically..but if the cap fits

With respect Jager you have been a pasing visitor on this forum for a while and have not witnessed half the **** that has gone on, I have also fought the guys corner for ages, like many others I might add,even when as a MOD on here so its a bit unfair to label some posters as not being mature enough to take discussion with a pinch of salt. we have pinched so much salt with the twat that most are able to ski down it !!

At what point do you say enough is enough? your not prepared to let sleeping dogs lie with this are you ? the only person on the whole site that has made reference to Daiswan is you! nobody else gives a flying **** mate,they just respect the decisions made by the MODS and move on.

You seem to have a problem with how things are done on here for some reason.

Can I ask you why out of the last 3 articles you've posted 2 of them are specific to Daiswan ?
What is the reason for this other than to keep an old argument going?
Most people are happy with the MODS and the way its all been handled but I suspect you are not, at least judging by your last few articles, "why is Daiswan banned" well why the **** does it bother you?

We arnt the European court of human rights, we are an internet forum, when **** happens its sorted out for the benefit of the majority NOT the minority!! the guy stuck two fingers up at the numerous warnings ,he didn't listen so he was ****ed off for a couple of weeks, the evidence od his removal has been free flowing DEBATE which is what we want on here.

Maybe its you that should be taking his banning with "a pinch of salt" and not trying to stir up a feeling of injustice where Dai dickhead is concerned, the bloke is big enough and dull enough to look out for himself and has had plenty of chances to stop Wumming his fellow jacks, maybe you should let sleeping dogs lie Jager ??

This will be my last word on the subject of Daiswan, im surprised you have produced articles about him and not football but of course that's your right, but it doesn't half make you come across as a bit bitter about something,not sure what though.

Anyway,its your article and you have the final word. I want to say that I respect you as a poster we just strongly dis-agree on this subject and that's fine, I look forward to reading the articles of yours that have no mention of Daiswan

 

No offence meant to anyone but I have to agree with everything Norway says. I've washed my hands with Dai, this board has been better without him

 

Norway the reason why I asked because I didn't know why !! And why shouldn't I ask that question ? And Norway forgive me for saying this but what the **** has it got to do with you what I post ? I'll post whatever I want,

I've also posted quite a few other things that had nothing to do with Dai which you've conveniently skirted about because it wouldn't fit your argument, like I've posted 20 threads, two of them about Dai, there would have only been one thread if the other wasn't closed to begin with.

And as I said Dai hasn't posted racist, homophobic, or anything extreme, like the twats on the general forum, yet he's singled out because he posts about Liverpool on here and he's in love with Brendan it seems. Is that the idea of extreme on the swans board now ?

Is it because he doesn't fit into the perfect little world of a swans fan on here and because he doesn't conform he gets banned ? Am I the next one to get banned because I question this ?

Just seems very hypocritical IMO and as I said childish

 

Well Dilli if you've washed your hands of him that is fine, just put him on ignore then there is no argument really.

 

I put him on ignore before Jäger but the problem was everyone else kicking off and the the thread being derailed. I'm not going to slag him off at all I've just had enough and intend to ignore any thread he derails in future. I've even taken breaks away from the forum just because of him and I know others have done the same too.

 

Jager- You are obviously very upset about how things are done here .

your saying its childish that he got banned ? now for the first time I begin to see what you have issues with on the Forum.

But please remember that when decent posters get fed up and leave because one bloke keeps wumming then something needs to be done. It has nothing to do with you or me its to do with the health of the forum we all visit and spend time on.

Don't twist my words by the way, all I said was of your last 3 threads,2 have been about Daiswan. That is proved by looking at the content on the forum page.


You are getting very sensitive about this whole issue when most just don't give a ****, most regular posters have been fair minded..for months!! the MODS need backing up not undermining , if you feel the need to keep dragging this non issue around like a bad smell feel free.

I and the majority of posters are glad of free content that doesn't end up turning into a "Liverpool and brenden " argument all the time.


As I said, sorry if you feel so sensitive but there we go, we agree to disagree on this

 

You accuse me of twisting your words, yet that is exactly what you are doing with mine, you assume I'm upset with the forum because I ask why Dai has been banned, that particular question has yet to be answered.

You mention wumming, but its okay for others to do it yet Dai is not allowed too because of the conformity issues he must abide by, but nobody else has to, so double standards there.

You accuse me of undermining the moderators, yet offer nothing that confirms that, and I haven't had any messages from said moderators saying I'm undermining anything.

You accuse me of being sensitive in this matter but nothing can be further from the truth, frankly I use this forum just to have a chat, like down the pub, and I don't get upset that I have the piss taken out of me down there, or that I wind people up there, it's all part of the parcel of having a banter.

And as for decent posters, can I just say that from what I've seen Dai is not normally given a chance, and is immediately rounded on because of the conformity issues, he deserves some ridicule at times because of his ridiculous point of view. But again it's his point of view that he needs to defend if people question it.

Perhaps you should look up and see what Mick has said that this forum is about posting freely. And lets face it this is a football forum mostly, and discussing Liverpool or any other club is football.

 

Wumming? Where did I say it's ok to wum??
Sensitive? Well its only you taking. Umbridge to recent events.
Undermining the mods ? Well your the one questioning their judgement by calling them childish.

As I said we will agree to disagree , I hold you in the sane regard as I always have, that's highly