And yours, with his reckless challenge and resulting red card Was the difference between a big payout of the Premier League and staying in the Championship. If you fail in the playoffs I'd say that's "destroying your club"
this is the pessimism police, this is your second warning. One more warning and i'll send you to the leeds forum.
i agree if they ref played to the laws teams would be playing 5 aside as for going up you have no players 14 loan players cant play in prem and if you dont go up 14 loan players cant play in the championship so basicly you are f*cked serves u right in the first place
You've probably had a few of us Tigers on here already but am rooting for you to go up in the play-offs your lads did you proud the last few games, also if I adjust my TV colour a bit I can pretend you are wearing our colours
Who didn't play today. Does that automatically mean the rest of our players are dirty and that that dirtiness was the reason you lost, and nothing to do with your team's own incompetence?
Can we stop replying to these scum. Then they can go away and reflect on their own mediocre season while we can look forward to 3 more games.
So...in dirty Leeds terminology, different amount of contact and different strength makes it EXACTLY the same?
You have Diouf therefore your team are scum. Which part of that are you not understanding? Would you like me to draw you a picture with crayons, Rachel?
It does when their argument is it's a red card on the basis of intent. Pushing a player in that manner is a foul. It was given as a foul. It is not a red card, a red card was not given. The decision was correct. Ekstrands push was also a foul, and was not given as a foul. The correct decision in this instance would be playing advantage, which was taken and resulted in a goal. I'm not aware of whether or not the referee noticed the push, but it was a push. It was not brushing someone off, it was an attempted push that failed because Poleon isn't a pathetic little wuss. As for the stone wall penalty and "red card" for Michael Brown? I've only just seen the one people were talking about as I didn't remember such an incident and assumed I'd missed it in the first 5 minutes that I wasn't at the pub. Your player FELL OVER in the box. That is not a foul, it's not a penalty, it's not a red card. Jesus Christ, I don't mind being hated, in fact I quite like it, but don't let that hatred cloud your objectivity, and at LEAST hate us for the right reasons.
You have an ex con in your team and therefore your team are scum. Using exact same logic as yours. Your use of that logic implies what I am saying.
I don't hate ye. Indifferent is the word I'd use. But your team are scumbags, from the deepest darkest pits in Hell.
Look, Barbara, Diouf trumps even murderers so my logic still stands. Your team are vile and breed scum. Thanks for your patience
What have you been on today Marko? Sure it cannot have been toast and marmalade as you would come over as a far sweeter person, even if your base would be a little crunchy. I called the stone wall penalty as I could see it all the way from France. Radio commentators called it straight away. TV that I had called it straight away and then proceeded to show it again from a number of different angles to prove their point. All were in agreement that Michael Brown was a very lucky boy to stay on the pitch. FELL OVER, I don't think so. Perhaps you should take your shades off, open your eyes, and give up on whatever is doing you so much harm.
Mark, now who's coming across bitter, suggest you trundle off to the Leeds forum where there more people with a similar IQ, your witty banter is wasted here....
Yes and you are the massive club who think you have the divine right to be in the premier league because of achievements 30 years ago. Where have you finished? Mid table, well done.
