http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/sport/spl/4887547/Gilmour-is-only-man-to-crack-this-case.html for the workies with domain blockers... By BILL LECKIE Published: 12 hrs ago 3 IN EVERY episode of Columbo, the bad guyâs always on the verge on getting away with it because the shabby âtec seems to be buying his story. Until, that is, the wee fella turns on his heel as he reaches the door and mumbles the line: âSorry to be a pest, but I have one more question... â At which point, the trail of lies is shredded into a million pieces. So, whoâll be playing the role of Columbo today as the EssPeeEll votes on its future? Whoâll be the one, just when 12-12-18 is about to be shoe-horned through, to stand up and say: âSorry to delay things here, but just one question.â âYeeeessssss... â âEr... WHY is this the only option to save Scottish football?â Because thatâs what we keep being told, that itâs this or itâs oblivion. And itâs an argument as flimsy as the average moustachioed murdering ratbagâs alibi. Here we have the heads of the 12 biggest clubs in the country, a dozen people whoâve found success in their own fields of enterprise and shown the drive to win charge of sporting businesses which sit at the heart of communities. Yet when it comes to restructuring a struggling game for the good of all, they have neither the creativity, nor the free will, to come up with any alternative to one no one seems genuinely excited about? Sorry, but if thatâs the case theyâre clearly the wrong people to be making the decision. Fact is, 12-12-18 ISNâT the only option. Itâs merely the only option weâre being given, which isnât the same thing and which simply isnât good enough. Those backing it do so with a sense of withering acceptance, not one of optimism. Those who oppose it â notably St Mirren chairman Stewart Gilmour â are accused of âself-interestâ and of âcondemning the game to meltdownâ. But no one tells us WHY itâs vote yes or die today. They just keep telling us it has to go through, because it has to go through. Well, let me tell every chairman in that room here and now. It doesnât have to go through. In fact, it must not go through, unless each and every one of you is absolutely convinced it will work. Thatâs why someone in there has to have the balls to say: âWe all know things must change but surely there has to be a better way...â At which point, they order up a vat of coffee and a mountain of sandwiches and refuse to leave the room until they come up with a solution clubs and fans alike can actually buy into. Like a 16-team top division, playing each other twice. Then, after 30 games, splitting into two eights who play each other once to settle the title, European places and relegation. There, that wasnât difficult, was it? This is the system voted through in Poland this week, with the full backing of TV companies who think it might be just the thing to turn around their own stagnating game. Now, to most EssPeeEll chairmen, 16 is of course the number of the beast. Itâs the size of league that robs them off their Unholy Grail, because it automatically reduces the number of home gates. But the Poles have got round this with their novel twist on the split idea. Their model would give top-flight teams here 37 games rather than 38, which isnât much of a hit to take in return for opening up the league to more clubs. All in all, it seems to me the perfect halfway house between the dilemma of maintaining home fixture income and taking the top half of the current First Division out of the poverty trap. Vote this through rather than 12-12-18 and next season weâd have Thistle, Morton and two of Falkirk, Livingston and Dunfermline. Clubs with potential to pull in bigger crowds, as proved by the top two drawing 9,000 to Firhill in midweek. Why canât we have this as an option? Why are so many minds within the EssPeeEll so closed to anything beyond the cobbled-up compromise theyâre standing by? Gilmour keeps hearing his accusation that heâs going against the grain out of self-interest, but itâs surely anything but seeing as all itâs got him is abuse. The easy decision is to vote with the gang and not rock the boat. It takes guts to stand up and say no. Of course, the irony in the stick Gilmour has taken is that one of his main reasons for opposing 12-12-18 is that it wonât change the 11-1 majority needed to push any vote through the EssPeeEll. Why do we have that rule? The self-interest of Celtic and Rangers, who wanted to make sure nothing ever happened without both of them agreeing to it. And why do Celtic more than anyone want that rule to stay? So that once Rangers scramble back from the wilderness, the Old Firmâs age-old status quo reigns again. Until we end that, until we give every club the same power on the old-fashioned basis that we live in a democracy, we could rearrange the deckchairs however we like and the ship will keep on sinking. If the 12 chairmen in that room today canât see that, if they canât grab the problem by the scruff and deal with it like grown-ups, they should adjourn the vote, stand aside and let someone else have a go. Because, letâs be brutally honest, if 12-12-18 really IS the only option, Scottish footballâs banjaxed anyway. Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/scotsol/hom...nly-man-to-crack-this-case.html#ixzz2QX03GnWX
I hate to say it but Leckie is a St Mirren fan and it's no surprise that he will take the side of his chairman. Gilmour is unhappy with the 11-1 voting system but does not want it changed apaprently, his opposition makes no sense that I can see. The self-interest of Celtic and Rangers? I'm afraid Leckie is an even bigger clown than I thought if he thinks Celtic and Rangers are the only clubs are guilty of self interest, it's not these clubs who want a guaranteed 4 games a season against each other. That would be clubs like St Mirren.
The point I agreed with was the league format, 16 top then split into 8. He's a dick and what's the Ess-Pee-Ell ****e he's been saying since it formed, is it supposed to be funny?
Apparently 7 of the 16 clubs in Portugal have worse home attendances than St Johnstone http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primeira_Liga#Attendance