holy crap Flyer are you on commission to advertise the need for PROZAC, it is it some sort of twisted cry for the samaritans phone number?
For a smart guy you are wide of the mark here mate. If a shot is on target and takes a deflection the shot taker will be credited with the goal. Like it has in this case, given to Gibson.
I showed you the link where thats proved false. Hoillets shot was also on target as well, I was right behind it. It has to be going in, not just on target. Cesar would have saved the shot without the deflection hence its an OG.
I notice there are 50 guests viewing this thread! Nice to be so popular. Probably the same folks who stop to gawp at a fatal car crash.
Thats that folks!. To be honest,I thought it was curtains a few weeks ago. In a way,I think it would be good to be relegated early,so we can start planing for next season. What a sorry-arsed few seaosns. Lost a lot of my passion in that time
Same here, Im looking forward to seeing players for next year like Yun, id start playing Green unless Cesar is going to stay.
Not sure that's correct. Who makes the decision that a shot is definitely going in? Much simpler to state that a shot on target is credited to the striker rather than arguing whether it was going in or not.
We'll just have to wait and see don't we. For now it's given to Gibson on the official Premier League home page. Can't remember how the deflection for Hoiletts goal in the reverse was apart from it being quite wicked. Was two Everton players involved in the deflection?
They have a dubious goals panel and they make the decision, Hoilett would have got the goal in the reverse fixture if it just had to be on target.
No, goalie was diving one was and the ball was deflected into the other corner, just like this one. 2-0, players doing something Ive said we should do all season, just stand in front of the goalie. Its amazing how we dont do the simple things, if thats our corner, its an easy save for the goalie.